Critics concerning interfaces and subclasses.
![]() | Note |
---|---|
It is not clear why this category has the name “Planned Extensions”. |
The current version of ArgoUML has three critics in this category.
Suggestion that there is no point in having non-public operations in Interfaces, since they must be visible to be realized by a class.
Suggestion that an interfaces has attributes defined. The UML standard defines interfaces to have operations.
![]() | Caution |
---|---|
ArgoUML does not allow you to add attributes to interfaces, so this should never occur in the ArgoUML model. It might trigger if a project has been loaded with XMI created by another tool. |