The class makes an extra copy of the events, we need to investigate if closer collaboration with its collocated EC could be used to remove that copy.
Marina Spivak made the following observation: these classes and implementation seem nearly identical to those in EC_Reactive_ConsumerControl.* The only differences are using consumer_admin collection vs supplier_admin, and calling disconnect_push_consumer vs disconnect_push_supplier ... Seems like it may be a good idea to change some naming and templatize...
The same templates should be used for the Notification and COS Event services.
Update class documentation below.
This could be eliminated if efficient reassembly // could be implemented without it. octet padding[4];
This class is an ACE_Service_Object, but the only reason for it is the need for easy configuration using files. Since ACE_Service_Object provides much more than that, we should look into replacing it with a more lightweight utility that would serve our needs.