[ Index ] |
PHP Cross Reference of Phabricator |
[Summary view] [Print] [Text view]
1 @title Differential User Guide: Test Plans 2 @group userguide 3 4 This document describes things you should think about when developing a test 5 plan. 6 7 = Overview = 8 9 When you send a revision for review in Differential you must include a test plan 10 (this can be disabled or made optional in the config). A test plan is a 11 repeatable list of steps which document what you have done to verify the 12 behavior of a change. A good test plan convinces a reviewer that you have been 13 thorough in making sure your change works as intended and has enough detail to 14 allow someone unfamiliar with your change to verify its behavior. 15 16 This document has some common things to think about when developing or reviewing 17 a test plan. Some of these suggestions might not be applicable to the software 18 you are writing; they are adapted from Facebook's internal documentation. 19 20 = All Changes = 21 22 - **Error Handling:** Are errors detected and handled properly? How does your 23 change deal with error cases? Did you test them and make sure you got the 24 right error messages and the right behavior? It's important that you test 25 what happens when things go wrong, not just that the change works if 26 everything else also works. 27 - **Service Impact:** How does your change affect services like memcache, 28 thrift, or databases? Are you adding new cachekeys or queries? Will 29 this change add a lot of load to services? 30 - **Performance:** How does your change affect performance? **NOTE**: If 31 your change is a performance-motivated change, you should include 32 measurements, profiles or other data in your test plan proving that you have 33 improved performance. 34 - **Unit Tests:** Is your change adequately covered by unit tests? Could you 35 improve test coverage? If you're fixing a bug, did you add a test to prevent 36 it from happening again? Are the unit tests testing just the code in 37 question, or would a failure of a database or network service cause your 38 test to fail? 39 - **Concurrent Change Robustness:** If you're making a refactoring change, is 40 it robust against people introducing new calls between the time you started 41 the change and when you commit it? For example, if you change the parameter 42 order of some function from ##f(a, b)## to ##f(b, a)## and a new callsite is 43 introduced in the meantime, could it go unnoticed? How bad would that be? 44 (Because of this risk, you should almost never make parameter order 45 changes in weakly typed languages like PHP and Javascript.) 46 - **Revert Plan:** If your change needs to be reverted and you aren't around, 47 are any special steps or considerations that the reverter needs to know 48 about? If there are, make sure they're adequately described in the "Revert 49 Plan" field so someone without any knowledge of your patch (but with a 50 general knowledge of the system) can successfully revert your change. 51 - **Security:** Is your change robust against XSS, CSRF, and injection 52 attacks? Are you verifying the user has the right capabilities or 53 permissions? Are you consistently treating user data as untrustworthy? Are 54 you escaping data properly, and using dangerous functions only 55 when they are strictly necessary? 56 - **Architecture:** Is this the right change? Could there be a better way to 57 solve the problem? Have you talked to (or added as reviewers) domain experts 58 if you aren't one yourself? What are the limitations of this solution? What 59 tradeoffs did you make, and why? 60 61 = Frontend / User-Facing Changes = 62 63 - **Static Resources:** Will your change cause the application to serve more 64 JS or CSS? Can you use less JS/CSS, or reuse more? 65 - **Browsers:** Have you tested your change in multiple browsers?
title
Description
Body
title
Description
Body
title
Description
Body
title
Body
Generated: Sun Nov 30 09:20:46 2014 | Cross-referenced by PHPXref 0.7.1 |