| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > exalim | GIF version | ||
| Description: One direction of a classical definition of existential quantification. One direction of Definition of [Margaris] p. 49. For a decidable proposition, this is an equivalence, as seen as dfexdc 1430. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Jul-2018.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| exalim | ⊢ (∃𝑥𝜑 → ¬ ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜑) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | alnex 1428 | . . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∃𝑥𝜑) | |
| 2 | 1 | biimpi 118 | . 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ∃𝑥𝜑) |
| 3 | 2 | con2i 589 | 1 ⊢ (∃𝑥𝜑 → ¬ ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜑) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ∀wal 1282 ∃wex 1421 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 5 ax-2 6 ax-mp 7 ax-ia1 104 ax-ia2 105 ax-ia3 106 ax-in1 576 ax-in2 577 ax-5 1376 ax-gen 1378 ax-ie2 1423 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 115 df-tru 1287 df-fal 1290 |
| This theorem is referenced by: n0rf 3260 ax9vsep 3901 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |