| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > nexd | GIF version | ||
| Description: Deduction for generalization rule for negated wff. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2002.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| nexd.1 | ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) |
| nexd.2 | ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| nexd | ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ ∃𝑥𝜓) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | nexd.1 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) | |
| 2 | nexd.2 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓) | |
| 3 | 1, 2 | alrimih 1398 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜓) |
| 4 | alnex 1428 | . 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜓 ↔ ¬ ∃𝑥𝜓) | |
| 5 | 3, 4 | sylib 120 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ ∃𝑥𝜓) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ∀wal 1282 ∃wex 1421 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 5 ax-2 6 ax-mp 7 ax-ia1 104 ax-ia2 105 ax-ia3 106 ax-in1 576 ax-in2 577 ax-5 1376 ax-gen 1378 ax-ie2 1423 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 115 df-tru 1287 df-fal 1290 |
| This theorem is referenced by: nexdv 1852 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |