MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  mercolem5 Structured version   Visualization version   Unicode version

Theorem mercolem5 1666
Description: Used to rederive the Tarski-Bernays-Wajsberg axioms from merco2 1661. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 16-Aug-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
mercolem5  |-  ( th 
->  ( ( th  ->  ph )  ->  ( ta  ->  ( ch  ->  ph )
) ) )

Proof of Theorem mercolem5
StepHypRef Expression
1 merco2 1661 . 2  |-  ( ( ( ph  ->  ph )  ->  ( ( F.  ->  ph )  ->  ph ) )  ->  ( ( ph  ->  ph )  ->  ( ph  ->  ( ph  ->  ph ) ) ) )
2 merco2 1661 . . . . 5  |-  ( ( ( ph  ->  ph )  ->  ( ( F.  ->  ph )  ->  th )
)  ->  ( ( th  ->  ph )  ->  ( ta  ->  ( ch  ->  ph ) ) ) )
3 mercolem1 1662 . . . . 5  |-  ( ( ( ( ph  ->  ph )  ->  ( ( F.  ->  ph )  ->  th )
)  ->  ( ( th  ->  ph )  ->  ( ta  ->  ( ch  ->  ph ) ) ) )  ->  ( ( ( F.  ->  ph )  ->  th )  ->  ( th 
->  ( ( th  ->  ph )  ->  ( ta  ->  ( ch  ->  ph )
) ) ) ) )
42, 3ax-mp 5 . . . 4  |-  ( ( ( F.  ->  ph )  ->  th )  ->  ( th  ->  ( ( th 
->  ph )  ->  ( ta  ->  ( ch  ->  ph ) ) ) ) )
5 mercolem2 1663 . . . . 5  |-  ( ( ( th  ->  (
( th  ->  ph )  ->  ( ta  ->  ( ch  ->  ph ) ) ) )  ->  th )  ->  ( ( F.  ->  ph )  ->  ( ( F.  ->  ph )  ->  th )
) )
6 merco2 1661 . . . . 5  |-  ( ( ( ( th  ->  ( ( th  ->  ph )  ->  ( ta  ->  ( ch  ->  ph ) ) ) )  ->  th )  ->  ( ( F.  ->  ph )  ->  ( ( F.  ->  ph )  ->  th )
) )  ->  (
( ( ( F. 
->  ph )  ->  th )  ->  ( th  ->  (
( th  ->  ph )  ->  ( ta  ->  ( ch  ->  ph ) ) ) ) )  ->  (
( ( ( ph  ->  ph )  ->  (
( F.  ->  ph )  ->  ph ) )  -> 
( ( ph  ->  ph )  ->  ( ph  ->  ( ph  ->  ph )
) ) )  -> 
( ( ( (
ph  ->  ph )  ->  (
( F.  ->  ph )  ->  ph ) )  -> 
( ( ph  ->  ph )  ->  ( ph  ->  ( ph  ->  ph )
) ) )  -> 
( th  ->  (
( th  ->  ph )  ->  ( ta  ->  ( ch  ->  ph ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
75, 6ax-mp 5 . . . 4  |-  ( ( ( ( F.  ->  ph )  ->  th )  ->  ( th  ->  (
( th  ->  ph )  ->  ( ta  ->  ( ch  ->  ph ) ) ) ) )  ->  (
( ( ( ph  ->  ph )  ->  (
( F.  ->  ph )  ->  ph ) )  -> 
( ( ph  ->  ph )  ->  ( ph  ->  ( ph  ->  ph )
) ) )  -> 
( ( ( (
ph  ->  ph )  ->  (
( F.  ->  ph )  ->  ph ) )  -> 
( ( ph  ->  ph )  ->  ( ph  ->  ( ph  ->  ph )
) ) )  -> 
( th  ->  (
( th  ->  ph )  ->  ( ta  ->  ( ch  ->  ph ) ) ) ) ) ) )
84, 7ax-mp 5 . . 3  |-  ( ( ( ( ph  ->  ph )  ->  ( ( F.  ->  ph )  ->  ph )
)  ->  ( ( ph  ->  ph )  ->  ( ph  ->  ( ph  ->  ph ) ) ) )  ->  ( ( ( ( ph  ->  ph )  ->  ( ( F.  ->  ph )  ->  ph ) )  ->  ( ( ph  ->  ph )  ->  ( ph  ->  ( ph  ->  ph ) ) ) )  ->  ( th  ->  ( ( th  ->  ph )  ->  ( ta  ->  ( ch  ->  ph ) ) ) ) ) )
91, 8ax-mp 5 . 2  |-  ( ( ( ( ph  ->  ph )  ->  ( ( F.  ->  ph )  ->  ph )
)  ->  ( ( ph  ->  ph )  ->  ( ph  ->  ( ph  ->  ph ) ) ) )  ->  ( th  ->  ( ( th  ->  ph )  ->  ( ta  ->  ( ch  ->  ph ) ) ) ) )
101, 9ax-mp 5 1  |-  ( th 
->  ( ( th  ->  ph )  ->  ( ta  ->  ( ch  ->  ph )
) ) )
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:    -> wi 4   F. wfal 1488
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-tru 1486  df-fal 1489
This theorem is referenced by:  mercolem6  1667  mercolem7  1668
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator