Theorem 3impexpbicomiVD 39093

Description: Virtual deduction proof of 3impexpbicomi 38686. The following user's proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.

h1::	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏))
qed:1,?: e0a 38999	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃))))

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
3impexpbicomiVD.1	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
3impexpbicomiVD	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃))))

Proof of Theorem 3impexpbicomiVD

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		3impexpbicomiVD.1	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏))
2		3impexpbicom 38685	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃)))))
3	2	biimpi 206	. 2 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃)))))
4	1, 3	e0a 38999	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃))))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 196   ∧ w3a 1037

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-an 386  df-3an 1039

This theorem is referenced by: (None)