Subversion was designed with an abstract network layer. This means that a repository can be programmatically accessed by any sort of server process, and the client “repository access” API allows programmers to write plugins that speak relevant network protocols. In theory, Subversion can use an infinite number of network implementations. In practice, there are only two servers at the time of this writing.
Apache is an extremely popular webserver; using the mod_dav_svn module, Apache can access a repository and make it available to clients via the WebDAV/DeltaV protocol, which is an extension of HTTP. Because Apache is an extremely extensible web server, it provides a number of features “for free”, such as encrypted SSL communication, logging, integration with a number of third-party authentication systems, and limited built-in web browsing of repositories.
In the other corner is svnserve: a small, lightweight server program that speaks a custom protocol with clients. Because its protocol is explicitly designed for Subversion and is stateful (unlike HTTP), it provides significantly faster network operations—but at the cost of some features as well. It only understands CRAM-MD5 authentication, has no logging, no web-browsing, and no option to encrypt network traffic. It is, however, extremely easy to set up and is often the best option for small teams just starting out with Subversion.
A third option is to use svnserve
tunneled over an SSH connection. Even though this scenario
still uses svnserve, it differs quite a bit
in features from a traditional svnserve
deployment. SSH is used to encrypt all communication. SSH is
also used exclusively to authenticate, so real system accounts
are required on the server host (unlike
vanilla svnserve, which has its own private
user accounts.) Finally, because this setup requires that each
user spawn a private, temporary svnserve
process, it's equivalent (from a permissions point of view) to
allowing a group of local users to all access the repository
file:// URLs. Path-based access control
has no meaning, since each user is accessing the repository
database files directly.
Here's a quick summary of the three typical server deployments.
Table 6.1. Comparison of Subversion Server Options
|Feature||Apache + mod_dav_svn||svnserve||svnserve over SSH|
|Authentication options||HTTP(S) basic auth, X.509 certificates, LDAP, NTLM, or any other mechanism available to Apache httpd||CRAM-MD5||SSH|
|User account options||private 'users' file||private 'users' file||system accounts|
|Authorization options||read/write access can be granted over whole repository, or specified per-path.||read/write access can be granted over whole repository, or specified per-path.||read/write access only grantable over whole repository|
|Encryption||via optional SSL||none||SSH tunneled|
|Logging||full Apache logs of each HTTP request, with optional “high-level” logging of general client operations||no logging||no logging|
|Interoperability||partially usable by other WebDAV clients||only talks to svn clients||only talks to svn clients|
|Web viewing||limited built-in support, or via 3rd-party tools such as ViewVC||only via 3rd-party tools such as ViewVC||only via 3rd-party tools such as ViewVC|
|Speed||somewhat slower||somewhat faster||somewhat faster|
|Initial setup||somewhat complex||extremely simple||moderately simple|