Caution: This chapter is under repair!
This chapter discusses SWIG's support of Tcl. SWIG currently requires Tcl 8.0 or a later release. Earlier releases of SWIG supported Tcl 7.x, but this is no longer supported.
To build a Tcl module, run SWIG using the -tcl option :
$ swig -tcl example.i
If building a C++ extension, add the -c++ option:
$ swig -c++ -tcl example.i
This creates a file example_wrap.c or example_wrap.cxx that contains all of the code needed to build a Tcl extension module. To finish building the module, you need to compile this file and link it with the rest of your program.
In order to compile the wrapper code, the compiler needs the tcl.h header file. This file is usually contained in the directory
/usr/local/include
Be aware that some Tcl versions install this header file with a version number attached to it. If this is the case, you should probably make a symbolic link so that tcl.h points to the correct header file.
The preferred approach to building an extension module is to compile it into a shared object file or DLL. Assuming you have code you need to link to in a file called example.c, you will need to compile your program using commands like this (shown for Linux):
$ swig -tcl example.i $ gcc -fPIC -c example.c $ gcc -fPIC -c example_wrap.c -I/usr/local/include $ gcc -shared example.o example_wrap.o -o example.so
The exact commands for doing this vary from platform to platform. SWIG tries to guess the right options when it is installed. Therefore, you may want to start with one of the examples in the SWIG/Examples/tcl directory. If that doesn't work, you will need to read the man-pages for your compiler and linker to get the right set of options. You might also check the SWIG Wiki for additional information.
When linking the module, the name of the output file has to match the name of the module. If the name of your SWIG module is "example", the name of the corresponding object file should be "example.so". The name of the module is specified using the %module directive or the -module command line option.
An alternative approach to dynamic linking is to rebuild the Tcl interpreter with your extension module added to it. In the past, this approach was sometimes necessary due to limitations in dynamic loading support on certain machines. However, the situation has improved greatly over the last few years and you should not consider this approach unless there is really no other option.
The usual procedure for adding a new module to Tcl involves writing a special function Tcl_AppInit() and using it to initialize the interpreter and your module. With SWIG, the tclsh.i and wish.i library files can be used to rebuild the tclsh and wish interpreters respectively. For example:
%module example
%inline %{
extern int fact(int);
extern int mod(int, int);
extern double My_variable;
%}
%include "tclsh.i" // Include code for rebuilding tclsh
The tclsh.i library file includes supporting code that contains everything needed to rebuild tclsh. To rebuild the interpreter, you simply do something like this:
$ swig -tcl example.i
$ gcc example.c example_wrap.c \
-Xlinker -export-dynamic \
-DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/usr/local/include/ \
-L/usr/local/lib -ltcl -lm -ldl \
-o mytclsh
You will need to supply the same libraries that were used to build Tcl the first time. This may include system libraries such as -lsocket, -lnsl, and -lpthread. If this actually works, the new version of Tcl should be identical to the default version except that your extension module will be a built-in part of the interpreter.
Comment: In practice, you should probably try to avoid static linking if possible. Some programmers may be inclined to use static linking in the interest of getting better performance. However, the performance gained by static linking tends to be rather minimal in most situations (and quite frankly not worth the extra hassle in the opinion of this author).
To use your module, simply use the Tcl load command. If all goes well, you will be able to this:
$ tclsh % load ./example.so % fact 4 24 %
A common error received by first-time users is the following:
% load ./example.so couldn't find procedure Example_Init %
This error is almost always caused when the name of the shared object file doesn't match the name of the module supplied using the SWIG %module directive. Double-check the interface to make sure the module name and the shared object file match. Another possible cause of this error is forgetting to link the SWIG-generated wrapper code with the rest of your application when creating the extension module.
Another common error is something similar to the following:
% load ./example.so couldn't load file "./example.so": ./example.so: undefined symbol: fact %
This error usually indicates that you forgot to include some object files or libraries in the linking of the shared library file. Make sure you compile both the SWIG wrapper file and your original program into a shared library file. Make sure you pass all of the required libraries to the linker.
Sometimes unresolved symbols occur because a wrapper has been created for a function that doesn't actually exist in a library. This usually occurs when a header file includes a declaration for a function that was never actually implemented or it was removed from a library without updating the header file. To fix this, you can either edit the SWIG input file to remove the offending declaration or you can use the %ignore directive to ignore the declaration.
Finally, suppose that your extension module is linked with another library like this:
$ gcc -shared example.o example_wrap.o -L/home/beazley/projects/lib -lfoo \
-o example.so
If the foo library is compiled as a shared library, you might get the following problem when you try to use your module:
% load ./example.so couldn't load file "./example.so": libfoo.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory %
This error is generated because the dynamic linker can't locate the libfoo.so library. When shared libraries are loaded, the system normally only checks a few standard locations such as /usr/lib and /usr/local/lib. To fix this problem, there are several things you can do. First, you can recompile your extension module with extra path information. For example, on Linux you can do this:
$ gcc -shared example.o example_wrap.o -L/home/beazley/projects/lib -lfoo \
-Xlinker -rpath /home/beazley/projects/lib \
-o example.so
Alternatively, you can set the LD_LIBRARY_PATH environment variable to include the directory with your shared libraries. If setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH, be aware that setting this variable can introduce a noticeable performance impact on all other applications that you run. To set it only for Tcl, you might want to do this instead:
$ env LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/beazley/projects/lib tclsh
Finally, you can use a command such as ldconfig to add additional search paths to the default system configuration (this requires root access and you will need to read the man pages).
Compilation of C++ extensions has traditionally been a tricky problem. Since the Tcl interpreter is written in C, you need to take steps to make sure C++ is properly initialized and that modules are compiled correctly.
On most machines, C++ extension modules should be linked using the C++ compiler. For example:
% swig -c++ -tcl example.i % g++ -fPIC -c example.cxx % g++ -fPIC -c example_wrap.cxx -I/usr/local/include % g++ -shared example.o example_wrap.o -o example.so
In addition to this, you may need to include additional library files to make it work. For example, if you are using the Sun C++ compiler on Solaris, you often need to add an extra library -lCrun like this:
% swig -c++ -tcl example.i % CC -KPIC -c example.cxx % CC -KPIC -c example_wrap.cxx -I/usr/local/include % CC -G example.o example_wrap.o -L/opt/SUNWspro/lib -o example.so -lCrun
Of course, the extra libraries to use are completely non-portable---you will probably need to do some experimentation.
Sometimes people have suggested that it is necessary to relink the Tcl interpreter using the C++ compiler to make C++ extension modules work. In the experience of this author, this has never actually appeared to be necessary. Relinking the interpreter with C++ really only includes the special run-time libraries described above---as long as you link your extension modules with these libraries, it should not be necessary to rebuild Tcl.
If you aren't entirely sure about the linking of a C++ extension, you might look at an existing C++ program. On many Unix machines, the ldd command will list library dependencies. This should give you some clues about what you might have to include when you link your extension module. For example:
$ ldd swig
libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2 => /usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2 (0x40019000)
libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0x4005b000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x40077000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x40000000)
$
As a final complication, a major weakness of C++ is that it does not define any sort of standard for binary linking of libraries. This means that C++ code compiled by different compilers will not link together properly as libraries nor is the memory layout of classes and data structures implemented in any kind of portable manner. In a monolithic C++ program, this problem may be unnoticed. However, in Tcl, it is possible for different extension modules to be compiled with different C++ compilers. As long as these modules are self-contained, this probably won't matter. However, if these modules start sharing data, you will need to take steps to avoid segmentation faults and other erratic program behavior. If working with lots of software components, you might want to investigate using a more formal standard such as COM.
On platforms that support 64-bit applications (Solaris, Irix, etc.), special care is required when building extension modules. On these machines, 64-bit applications are compiled and linked using a different set of compiler/linker options. In addition, it is not generally possible to mix 32-bit and 64-bit code together in the same application.
To utilize 64-bits, the Tcl executable will need to be recompiled as a 64-bit application. In addition, all libraries, wrapper code, and every other part of your application will need to be compiled for 64-bits. If you plan to use other third-party extension modules, they will also have to be recompiled as 64-bit extensions.
If you are wrapping commercial software for which you have no source code, you will be forced to use the same linking standard as used by that software. This may prevent the use of 64-bit extensions. It may also introduce problems on platforms that support more than one linking standard (e.g., -o32 and -n32 on Irix).
To avoid namespace problems, you can instruct SWIG to append a package prefix to all of your functions and variables. This is done using the -prefix option as follows :
swig -tcl -prefix Foo example.i
If you have a function "bar" in the SWIG file, the prefix option will append the prefix to the name when creating a command and call it "Foo_bar".
Alternatively, you can have SWIG install your module into a Tcl namespace by specifying the -namespace option :
swig -tcl -namespace example.i
By default, the name of the namespace will be the same as the module name, but you can override it using the -prefix option.
When the -namespace option is used, objects in the module are always accessed with the namespace name such as Foo::bar.
Building a SWIG extension to Tcl/Tk under Windows 95/NT is roughly similar to the process used with Unix. Normally, you will want to produce a DLL that can be loaded into tclsh or wish. This section covers the process of using SWIG with Microsoft Visual C++. although the procedure may be similar with other compilers.
If you are developing your application within Microsoft developer studio, SWIG can be invoked as a custom build option. The process roughly follows these steps :
Now, assuming all went well, SWIG will be automatically invoked when you build your project. Any changes made to the interface file will result in SWIG being automatically invoked to produce a new version of the wrapper file. To run your new Tcl extension, simply run tclsh or wish and use the load command. For example :
MSDOS > tclsh80 % load example.dll % fact 4 24 %
Alternatively, SWIG extensions can be built by writing a Makefile for NMAKE. To do this, make sure the environment variables for MSVC++ are available and the MSVC++ tools are in your path. Now, just write a short Makefile like this :
# Makefile for building various SWIG generated extensions SRCS = example.c IFILE = example INTERFACE = $(IFILE).i WRAPFILE = $(IFILE)_wrap.c # Location of the Visual C++ tools (32 bit assumed) TOOLS = c:\msdev TARGET = example.dll CC = $(TOOLS)\bin\cl.exe LINK = $(TOOLS)\bin\link.exe INCLUDE32 = -I$(TOOLS)\include MACHINE = IX86 # C Library needed to build a DLL DLLIBC = msvcrt.lib oldnames.lib # Windows libraries that are apparently needed WINLIB = kernel32.lib advapi32.lib user32.lib gdi32.lib comdlg32.lib winspool.lib # Libraries common to all DLLs LIBS = $(DLLIBC) $(WINLIB) # Linker options LOPT = -debug:full -debugtype:cv /NODEFAULTLIB /RELEASE /NOLOGO / MACHINE:$(MACHINE) -entry:_DllMainCRTStartup@12 -dll # C compiler flags CFLAGS = /Z7 /Od /c /nologo TCL_INCLUDES = -Id:\tcl8.0a2\generic -Id:\tcl8.0a2\win TCLLIB = d:\tcl8.0a2\win\tcl80.lib tcl:: ..\..\swig -tcl -o $(WRAPFILE) $(INTERFACE) $(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(TCL_INCLUDES) $(SRCS) $(WRAPFILE) set LIB=$(TOOLS)\lib $(LINK) $(LOPT) -out:example.dll $(LIBS) $(TCLLIB) example.obj example_wrap.obj
To build the extension, run NMAKE (you may need to run vcvars32 first). This is a pretty minimal Makefile, but hopefully its enough to get you started. With a little practice, you'll be making lots of Tcl extensions.
By default, SWIG tries to build a very natural Tcl interface to your C/C++ code. Functions are wrapped as functions, classes are wrapped in an interface that mimics the style of Tk widgets and [incr Tcl] classes. This section briefly covers the essential aspects of this wrapping.
The SWIG %module directive specifies the name of the Tcl module. If you specify `%module example', then everything is compiled into an extension module example.so. When choosing a module name, make sure you don't use the same name as a built-in Tcl command.
One pitfall to watch out for is module names involving numbers. If you specify a module name like %module md5, you'll find that the load command no longer seems to work:
% load ./md5.so couldn't find procedure Md_Init
To fix this, supply an extra argument to load like this:
% load ./md5.so md5
Global functions are wrapped as new Tcl built-in commands. For example,
%module example int fact(int n);
creates a built-in function fact that works exactly like you think it does:
% load ./example.so % fact 4 24 % set x [fact 6] %
C/C++ global variables are wrapped by Tcl global variables. For example:
// SWIG interface file with global variables
%module example
...
%inline %{
extern double density;
%}
...
Now look at the Tcl interface:
% puts $density # Output value of C global variable 1.0 % set density 0.95 # Change value
If you make an error in variable assignment, you will get an error message. For example:
% set density "hello" can't set "density": Type error. expected a double. %
If a variable is declared as const, it is wrapped as a read-only variable. Attempts to modify its value will result in an error.
To make ordinary variables read-only, you can use the %immutable directive. For example:
%{
extern char *path;
%}
%immutable;
extern char *path;
%mutable;
The %immutable directive stays in effect until it is explicitly disabled or cleared using %mutable. See the Creating read-only variables section for further details.
If you just want to make a specific variable immutable, supply a declaration name. For example:
%{
extern char *path;
%}
%immutable path;
...
extern char *path; // Read-only (due to %immutable)
C/C++ constants are installed as global Tcl variables containing the appropriate value. To create a constant, use #define, enum, or the %constant directive. For example:
#define PI 3.14159
#define VERSION "1.0"
enum Beverage { ALE, LAGER, STOUT, PILSNER };
%constant int FOO = 42;
%constant const char *path = "/usr/local";
For enums, make sure that the definition of the enumeration actually appears in a header file or in the wrapper file somehow---if you just stick an enum in a SWIG interface without also telling the C compiler about it, the wrapper code won't compile.
Note: declarations declared as const are wrapped as read-only variables and will be accessed using the cvar object described in the previous section. They are not wrapped as constants. For further discussion about this, see the SWIG Basics chapter.
Constants are not guaranteed to remain constant in Tcl---the value of the constant could be accidentally reassigned.You will just have to be careful.
A peculiarity of installing constants as variables is that it is necessary to use the Tcl global statement to access constants in procedure bodies. For example:
proc blah {} {
global FOO
bar $FOO
}
If a program relies on a lot of constants, this can be extremely annoying. To fix the problem, consider using the following typemap rule:
%apply int CONSTANT { int x };
#define FOO 42
...
void bar(int x);
When applied to an input argument, the CONSTANT rule allows a constant to be passed to a function using its actual value or a symbolic identifier name. For example:
proc blah {} {
bar FOO
}
When an identifier name is given, it is used to perform an implicit hash-table lookup of the value during argument conversion. This allows the global statement to be omitted.
C/C++ pointers are fully supported by SWIG. Furthermore, SWIG has no problem working with incomplete type information. Here is a rather simple interface:
%module example FILE *fopen(const char *filename, const char *mode); int fputs(const char *, FILE *); int fclose(FILE *);
When wrapped, you will be able to use the functions in a natural way from Tcl. For example:
% load ./example.so % set f [fopen junk w] % fputs "Hello World\n" $f % fclose $f
If this makes you uneasy, rest assured that there is no deep magic involved. Underneath the covers, pointers to C/C++ objects are simply represented as opaque values--normally an encoded character string like this:
% puts $f _c0671108_p_FILE %
This pointer value can be freely passed around to different C functions that expect to receive an object of type FILE *. The only thing you can't do is dereference the pointer from Tcl.
The NULL pointer is represented by the string NULL.
As much as you might be inclined to modify a pointer value directly from Tcl, don't. The hexadecimal encoding is not necessarily the same as the logical memory address of the underlying object. Instead it is the raw byte encoding of the pointer value. The encoding will vary depending on the native byte-ordering of the platform (i.e., big-endian vs. little-endian). Similarly, don't try to manually cast a pointer to a new type by simply replacing the type-string. This may not work like you expect and it is particularly dangerous when casting C++ objects. If you need to cast a pointer or change its value, consider writing some helper functions instead. For example:
%inline %{
/* C-style cast */
Bar *FooToBar(Foo *f) {
return (Bar *) f;
}
/* C++-style cast */
Foo *BarToFoo(Bar *b) {
return dynamic_cast<Foo*>(b);
}
Foo *IncrFoo(Foo *f, int i) {
return f+i;
}
%}
Also, if working with C++, you should always try to use the new C++ style casts. For example, in the above code, the C-style cast may return a bogus result whereas as the C++-style cast will return None if the conversion can't be performed.
If you wrap a C structure, it is wrapped by a Tcl interface that somewhat resembles a Tk widget. This provides a very natural interface. For example,
struct Vector {
double x,y,z;
};
is used as follows:
% Vector v % v configure -x 3.5 -y 7.2 % puts "[v cget -x] [v cget -y] [v cget -z]" 3.5 7.2 0.0 %
Similar access is provided for unions and the data members of C++ classes.
In the above example, v is a name that's used for the object. However, underneath the covers, there's a pointer to a raw C structure. This can be obtained by looking at the -this attribute. For example:
% puts [v cget -this] _88e31408_p_Vector
Further details about the relationship between the Tcl and the underlying C structure are covered a little later.
const members of a structure are read-only. Data members can also be forced to be read-only using the %immutable directive. For example:
struct Foo {
...
%immutable;
int x; /* Read-only members */
char *name;
%mutable;
...
};
When char * members of a structure are wrapped, the contents are assumed to be dynamically allocated using malloc or new (depending on whether or not SWIG is run with the -c++ option). When the structure member is set, the old contents will be released and a new value created. If this is not the behavior you want, you will have to use a typemap (described later).
If a structure contains arrays, access to those arrays is managed through pointers. For example, consider this:
struct Bar {
int x[16];
};
If accessed in Tcl, you will see behavior like this:
% Bar b % puts [b cget -x] _801861a4_p_int %
This pointer can be passed around to functions that expect to receive an int * (just like C). You can also set the value of an array member using another pointer. For example:
% Bar c % c configure -x [b cget -x] # Copy contents of b.x to c.x
For array assignment, SWIG copies the entire contents of the array starting with the data pointed to by b.x. In this example, 16 integers would be copied. Like C, SWIG makes no assumptions about bounds checking---if you pass a bad pointer, you may get a segmentation fault or access violation.
When a member of a structure is itself a structure, it is handled as a pointer. For example, suppose you have two structures like this:
struct Foo {
int a;
};
struct Bar {
Foo f;
};
Now, suppose that you access the f attribute of Bar like this:
% Bar b % set x [b cget -f]
In this case, x is a pointer that points to the Foo that is inside b. This is the same value as generated by this C code:
Bar b; Foo *x = &b->f; /* Points inside b */
However, one peculiarity of accessing a substructure like this is that the returned value does work quite like you might expect. For example:
% Bar b % set x [b cget -f] % x cget -a invalid command name "x"
This is because the returned value was not created in a normal way from the interpreter (x is not a command object). To make it function normally, just evaluate the variable like this:
% Bar b % set x [b cget -f] % $x cget -a 0 %
In this example, x points inside the original structure. This means that modifications work just like you would expect. For example:
% Bar b % set x [b cget -f] % $x configure -a 3 # Modifies contents of f (inside b) % [b cget -f] -configure -a 3 # Same thing
In many of these structure examples, a simple name like "v" or "b" has been given to wrapped structures. If necessary, this name can be passed to functions that expect to receive an object. For example, if you have a function like this,
void blah(Foo *f);
you can call the function in Tcl as follows:
% Foo x # Create a Foo object % blah x # Pass the object to a function
It is also possible to call the function using the raw pointer value. For instance:
% blah [x cget -this] # Pass object to a function
It is also possible to create and use objects using variables. For example:
% set b [Bar] # Create a Bar % $b cget -f # Member access % puts $b _108fea88_p_Bar %
Finally, to destroy objects created from Tcl, you can either let the object name go out of scope or you can explicitly delete the object. For example:
% Foo f # Create object f % rename f ""
or
% Foo f # Create object f % f -delete
Note: Tcl only destroys the underlying object if it has ownership. See the memory management section that appears shortly.
C++ classes are wrapped as an extension of structure wrapping. For example, if you have this class,
class List {
public:
List();
~List();
int search(char *item);
void insert(char *item);
void remove(char *item);
char *get(int n);
int length;
};
you can use it in Tcl like this:
% List x % x insert Ale % x insert Stout % x insert Lager % x get 1 Stout % puts [x cget -length] 3 %
Class data members are accessed in the same manner as C structures.
Static class members are accessed as global functions or variables. To illustrate, suppose you have a class like this:
class Spam {
public:
static void foo();
static int bar;
};
In Tcl, the static member is accessed as follows:
% Spam_foo # Spam::foo() % puts $Spam_bar # Spam::bar
SWIG is fully aware of issues related to C++ inheritance. Therefore, if you have classes like this
class Foo {
...
};
class Bar : public Foo {
...
};
An object of type Bar can be used where a Foo is expected. For example, if you have this function:
void spam(Foo *f);
then the function spam() accepts a Foo * or a pointer to any class derived from Foo. For instance:
% Foo f # Create a Foo % Bar b # Create a Bar % spam f # OK % spam b # OK
It is safe to use multiple inheritance with SWIG.
In C++, there are many different ways a function might receive and manipulate objects. For example:
void spam1(Foo *x); // Pass by pointer void spam2(Foo &x); // Pass by reference void spam3(Foo x); // Pass by value void spam4(Foo x[]); // Array of objects
In Tcl, there is no detailed distinction like this. Because of this, SWIG unifies all of these types together in the wrapper code. For instance, if you actually had the above functions, it is perfectly legal to do this:
% Foo f # Create a Foo % spam1 f # Ok. Pointer % spam2 f # Ok. Reference % spam3 f # Ok. Value. % spam4 f # Ok. Array (1 element)
Similar behavior occurs for return values. For example, if you had functions like this,
Foo *spam5(); Foo &spam6(); Foo spam7();
then all three functions will return a pointer to some Foo object. Since the third function (spam7) returns a value, newly allocated memory is used to hold the result and a pointer is returned (Tcl will release this memory when the return value is garbage collected).
C++ overloaded functions, methods, and constructors are mostly supported by SWIG. For example, if you have two functions like this:
void foo(int); void foo(char *c);
You can use them in Tcl in a straightforward manner:
% foo 3 # foo(int) % foo Hello # foo(char *c)
Similarly, if you have a class like this,
class Foo {
public:
Foo();
Foo(const Foo &);
...
};
you can write Tcl code like this:
% Foo f # Create a Foo % Foo g f # Copy f
Overloading support is not quite as flexible as in C++. Sometimes there are methods that SWIG can't disambiguate. For example:
void spam(int); void spam(short);
or
void foo(Bar *b); void foo(Bar &b);
If declarations such as these appear, you will get a warning message like this:
example.i:12: Warning 509: Overloaded method spam(short) effectively ignored, example.i:11: Warning 509: as it is shadowed by spam(int).
To fix this, you either need to ignore or rename one of the methods. For example:
%rename(spam_short) spam(short); ... void spam(int); void spam(short); // Accessed as spam_short
or
%ignore spam(short); ... void spam(int); void spam(short); // Ignored
SWIG resolves overloaded functions and methods using a disambiguation scheme that ranks and sorts declarations according to a set of type-precedence rules. The order in which declarations appear in the input does not matter except in situations where ambiguity arises--in this case, the first declaration takes precedence.
Please refer to the "SWIG and C++" chapter for more information about overloading.
Certain C++ overloaded operators can be handled automatically by SWIG. For example, consider a class like this:
class Complex {
private:
double rpart, ipart;
public:
Complex(double r = 0, double i = 0) : rpart(r), ipart(i) { }
Complex(const Complex &c) : rpart(c.rpart), ipart(c.ipart) { }
Complex &operator=(const Complex &c);
Complex operator+(const Complex &c) const;
Complex operator-(const Complex &c) const;
Complex operator*(const Complex &c) const;
Complex operator-() const;
double re() const { return rpart; }
double im() const { return ipart; }
};
When wrapped, it works like this:
% Complex c 3 4 % Complex d 7 8 % set e [c + d] % $e re 10.0 % $e im 12.0
It should be stressed that operators in SWIG have no relationship to operators in Tcl. In fact, the only thing that's happening here is that an operator like operator + has been renamed to a method +. Therefore, the statement [c + d] is really just invoking the + method on c. When more than operator is defined (with different arguments), the standard method overloading facilities are used. Here is a rather odd looking example:
% Complex c 3 4 % Complex d 7 8 % set e [c - d] # operator-(const Complex &) % puts "[$e re] [$e im]" 10.0 12.0 % set f [c -] # operator-() % puts "[$f re] [$f im]" -3.0 -4.0 %
One restriction with operator overloading support is that SWIG is not able to fully handle operators that aren't defined as part of the class. For example, if you had code like this
class Complex {
...
friend Complex operator+(double, const Complex &c);
...
};
then SWIG doesn't know what to do with the friend function--in fact, it simply ignores it and issues a warning. You can still wrap the operator, but you may have to encapsulate it in a special function. For example:
%rename(Complex_add_dc) operator+(double, const Complex &); ... Complex operator+(double, const Complex &c);
There are ways to make this operator appear as part of the class using the %extend directive. Keep reading.
SWIG is aware of C++ namespaces, but namespace names do not appear in the module nor do namespaces result in a module that is broken up into submodules or packages. For example, if you have a file like this,
%module example
namespace foo {
int fact(int n);
struct Vector {
double x,y,z;
};
};
it works in Tcl as follows:
% load ./example.so % fact 3 6 % Vector v % v configure -x 3.4
If your program has more than one namespace, name conflicts (if any) can be resolved using %rename For example:
%rename(Bar_spam) Bar::spam;
namespace Foo {
int spam();
}
namespace Bar {
int spam();
}
If you have more than one namespace and your want to keep their symbols separate, consider wrapping them as separate SWIG modules. For example, make the module name the same as the namespace and create extension modules for each namespace separately. If your program utilizes thousands of small deeply nested namespaces each with identical symbol names, well, then you get what you deserve.
C++ templates don't present a huge problem for SWIG. However, in order to create wrappers, you have to tell SWIG to create wrappers for a particular template instantiation. To do this, you use the %template directive. For example:
%module example
%{
#include "pair.h"
%}
template<class T1, class T2>
struct pair {
typedef T1 first_type;
typedef T2 second_type;
T1 first;
T2 second;
pair();
pair(const T1&, const T2&);
~pair();
};
%template(pairii) pair<int,int>;
In Tcl:
% pairii p 3 4 % p cget -first 3 % p cget -second 4
Obviously, there is more to template wrapping than shown in this example. More details can be found in the SWIG and C++ chapter. Some more complicated examples will appear later.
In certain C++ programs, it is common to use classes that have been wrapped by so-called "smart pointers." Generally, this involves the use of a template class that implements operator->() like this:
template<class T> class SmartPtr {
...
T *operator->();
...
}
Then, if you have a class like this,
class Foo {
public:
int x;
int bar();
};
A smart pointer would be used in C++ as follows:
SmartPtr<Foo> p = CreateFoo(); // Created somehow (not shown) ... p->x = 3; // Foo::x int y = p->bar(); // Foo::bar
To wrap this in Tcl, simply tell SWIG about the SmartPtr class and the low-level Foo object. Make sure you instantiate SmartPtr using %template if necessary. For example:
%module example ... %template(SmartPtrFoo) SmartPtr<Foo>; ...
Now, in Tcl, everything should just "work":
% set p [CreateFoo] # Create a smart-pointer somehow % $p configure -x 3 # Foo::x % $p bar # Foo::bar
If you ever need to access the underlying pointer returned by operator->() itself, simply use the __deref__() method. For example:
% set f [$p __deref__] # Returns underlying Foo *
In the previous section, a high-level view of Tcl wrapping was presented. A key component of this wrapping is that structures and classes are wrapped by Tcl class-like objects. This provides a very natural Tcl interface and allows SWIG to support a number of advanced features such as operator overloading. However, a number of low-level details were omitted. This section provides a brief overview of how the proxy classes work.
In the "SWIG basics" and "SWIG and C++" chapters, details of low-level structure and class wrapping are described. To summarize those chapters, if you have a class like this
class Foo {
public:
int x;
int spam(int);
...
then SWIG transforms it into a set of low-level procedural wrappers. For example:
Foo *new_Foo() {
return new Foo();
}
void delete_Foo(Foo *f) {
delete f;
}
int Foo_x_get(Foo *f) {
return f->x;
}
void Foo_x_set(Foo *f, int value) {
f->x = value;
}
int Foo_spam(Foo *f, int arg1) {
return f->spam(arg1);
}
These wrappers are actually found in the Tcl extension module. For example, you can certainly do this:
% load ./example.so % set f [new_Foo] % Foo_x_get $f 0 % Foo_spam $f 3 1 %
However, in addition to this, the classname Foo is used as an object constructor function. This allows objects to be encapsulated objects that look a lot like Tk widgets as shown in the last section.
Associated with each wrapped object, is an ownership flag thisown The value of this flag determines who is responsible for deleting the underlying C++ object. If set to 1, the Tcl interpreter destroys the C++ object when the proxy class is garbage collected. If set to 0 (or if the attribute is missing), then the destruction of the proxy class has no effect on the C++ object.
When an object is created by a constructor or returned by value, Tcl automatically takes ownership of the result. For example:
class Foo {
public:
Foo();
Foo bar();
};
In Tcl:
% Foo f % f cget -thisown 1 % set g [f bar] % $g cget -thisown 1
On the other hand, when pointers are returned to Tcl, there is often no way to know where they came from. Therefore, the ownership is set to zero. For example:
class Foo {
public:
...
Foo *spam();
...
};
% Foo f % set s [f spam] % $s cget -thisown 0 %
This behavior is especially important for classes that act as containers. For example, if a method returns a pointer to an object that is contained inside another object, you definitely don't want Tcl to assume ownership and destroy it!
Related to containers, ownership issues can arise whenever an object is assigned to a member or global variable. For example, consider this interface:
%module example
struct Foo {
int value;
Foo *next;
};
Foo *head = 0;
When wrapped in Tcl, careful observation will reveal that ownership changes whenever an object is assigned to a global variable. For example:
% Foo f % f cget -thisown 1 % set head f % f cget -thisown 0
In this case, C is now holding a reference to the object---you probably don't want Tcl to destroy it. Similarly, this occurs for members. For example:
% Foo f % Foo g % f cget -thisown 1 % g cget -thisown 1 % f configure -next g % g cget -thisown 0 %
For the most part, memory management issues remain hidden. However, there are occasionally situations where you might have to manually change the ownership of an object. For instance, consider code like this:
class Node {
Object *value;
public:
void set_value(Object *v) { value = v; }
...
};
Now, consider the following Tcl code:
% Object v # Create an object % Node n # Create a node % n setvalue v # Set value % v cget -thisown 1 %
In this case, the object n is holding a reference to v internally. However, SWIG has no way to know that this has occurred. Therefore, Tcl still thinks that it has ownership of the object. Should the proxy object be destroyed, then the C++ destructor will be invoked and n will be holding a stale-pointer. If you're lucky, you will only get a segmentation fault.
To work around this, it is always possible to flip the ownership flag. For example,
% v -disown # Give ownership to C/C++ % v -acquire # Acquire ownership
It is also possible to deal with situations like this using typemaps--an advanced topic discussed later.
A common problem in some C programs is handling parameters passed as simple pointers. For example:
void add(int x, int y, int *result) {
*result = x + y;
}
or perhaps
int sub(int *x, int *y) {
return *x+*y;
}
The easiest way to handle these situations is to use the typemaps.i file. For example:
%module example %include "typemaps.i" void add(int, int, int *OUTPUT); int sub(int *INPUT, int *INPUT);
In Tcl, this allows you to pass simple values instead of pointer. For example:
set a [add 3 4] puts $a 7
Notice how the INPUT parameters allow integer values to be passed instead of pointers and how the OUTPUT parameter creates a return result.
If you don't want to use the names INPUT or OUTPUT, use the %apply directive. For example:
%module example
%include "typemaps.i"
%apply int *OUTPUT { int *result };
%apply int *INPUT { int *x, int *y};
void add(int x, int y, int *result);
int sub(int *x, int *y);
If a function mutates one of its parameters like this,
void negate(int *x) {
*x = -(*x);
}
you can use INOUT like this:
%include "typemaps.i" ... void negate(int *INOUT);
In Tcl, a mutated parameter shows up as a return value. For example:
set a [negate 3] puts $a -3
The most common use of these special typemap rules is to handle functions that return more than one value. For example, sometimes a function returns a result as well as a special error code:
/* send message, return number of bytes sent, along with success code */ int send_message(char *text, int len, int *success);
To wrap such a function, simply use the OUTPUT rule above. For example:
%module example
%include "typemaps.i"
%apply int *OUTPUT { int *success };
...
int send_message(char *text, int *success);
When used in Tcl, the function will return multiple values as a list.
set r [send_message "Hello World"] set bytes [lindex $r 0] set success [lindex $r 1]
Another common use of multiple return values are in query functions. For example:
void get_dimensions(Matrix *m, int *rows, int *columns);
To wrap this, you might use the following:
%module example
%include "typemaps.i"
%apply int *OUTPUT { int *rows, int *columns };
...
void get_dimensions(Matrix *m, int *rows, *columns);
Now, in Perl:
set dim [get_dimensions $m] set r [lindex $dim 0] set c [lindex $dim 1]
The %exception directive can be used to create a user-definable exception handler in charge of converting exceptions in your C/C++ program into Tcl exceptions. The chapter on customization features contains more details, but suppose you extended the array example into a C++ class like the following :
class RangeError {}; // Used for an exception
class DoubleArray {
private:
int n;
double *ptr;
public:
// Create a new array of fixed size
DoubleArray(int size) {
ptr = new double[size];
n = size;
}
// Destroy an array
~DoubleArray() {
delete ptr;
}
// Return the length of the array
int length() {
return n;
}
// Get an item from the array and perform bounds checking.
double getitem(int i) {
if ((i >= 0) && (i < n))
return ptr[i];
else
throw RangeError();
}
// Set an item in the array and perform bounds checking.
void setitem(int i, double val) {
if ((i >= 0) && (i < n))
ptr[i] = val;
else {
throw RangeError();
}
}
};
The functions associated with this class can throw a C++ range exception for an out-of-bounds array access. We can catch this in our Tcl extension by specifying the following in an interface file :
%exception {
try {
$action // Gets substituted by actual function call
}
catch (RangeError) {
Tcl_SetResult(interp, (char *)"Array index out-of-bounds", TCL_STATIC);
return TCL_ERROR;
}
}
As shown, the exception handling code will be added to every wrapper function. Since this is somewhat inefficient. You might consider refining the exception handler to only apply to specific methods like this:
%exception getitem {
try {
$action
}
catch (RangeError) {
Tcl_SetResult(interp, (char *)"Array index out-of-bounds", TCL_STATIC);
return TCL_ERROR;
}
}
%exception setitem {
try {
$action
}
catch (RangeError) {
Tcl_SetResult(interp, (char *)"Array index out-of-bounds", TCL_STATIC);
return TCL_ERROR;
}
}
In this case, the exception handler is only attached to methods and functions named getitem and setitem.
If you had a lot of different methods, you can avoid extra typing by using a macro. For example:
%define RANGE_ERROR
{
try {
$action
}
catch (RangeError) {
Tcl_SetResult(interp, (char *)"Array index out-of-bounds", TCL_STATIC);
return TCL_ERROR;
}
}
%enddef
%exception getitem RANGE_ERROR;
%exception setitem RANGE_ERROR;
Since SWIG's exception handling is user-definable, you are not limited to C++ exception handling. See the chapter on "Customization Features" for more examples.
This section describes how you can modify SWIG's default wrapping behavior for various C/C++ datatypes using the %typemap directive. This is an advanced topic that assumes familiarity with the Tcl C API as well as the material in the "Typemaps" chapter.
Before proceeding, it should be stressed that typemaps are not a required part of using SWIG---the default wrapping behavior is enough in most cases. Typemaps are only used if you want to change some aspect of the primitive C-Tcl interface.
A typemap is nothing more than a code generation rule that is attached to a specific C datatype. For example, to convert integers from Tcl to C, you might define a typemap like this:
%module example
%typemap(in) int {
if (Tcl_GetIntFromObj(interp,$input,&$1) == TCL_ERROR) return TCL_ERROR;
printf("Received an integer : %d\n",$1);
}
%inline %{
extern int fact(int n);
%}
Typemaps are always associated with some specific aspect of code generation. In this case, the "in" method refers to the conversion of input arguments to C/C++. The datatype int is the datatype to which the typemap will be applied. The supplied C code is used to convert values. In this code a number of special variable prefaced by a $ are used. The $1 variable is placeholder for a local variable of type int. The $input variable is the input object of type Tcl_Obj *.
When this example is compiled into a Tcl module, it operates as follows:
% load ./example.so % fact 6 Received an integer : 6 720
In this example, the typemap is applied to all occurrences of the int datatype. You can refine this by supplying an optional parameter name. For example:
%module example
%typemap(in) int n {
if (Tcl_GetIntFromObj(interp,$input,&$1) == TCL_ERROR) return TCL_ERROR;
printf("n = %d\n",$1);
}
%inline %{
extern int fact(int n);
%}
In this case, the typemap code is only attached to arguments that exactly match int n.
The application of a typemap to specific datatypes and argument names involves more than simple text-matching--typemaps are fully integrated into the SWIG type-system. When you define a typemap for int, that typemap applies to int and qualified variations such as const int. In addition, the typemap system follows typedef declarations. For example:
%typemap(in) int n {
if (Tcl_GetIntFromObj(interp,$input,&$1) == TCL_ERROR) return TCL_ERROR;
printf("n = %d\n",$1);
}
%inline %{
typedef int Integer;
extern int fact(Integer n); // Above typemap is applied
%}
However, the matching of typedef only occurs in one direction. If you defined a typemap for Integer, it is not applied to arguments of type int.
Typemaps can also be defined for groups of consecutive arguments. For example:
%typemap(in) (char *str, int len) {
$1 = Tcl_GetStringFromObj($input,&$2);
};
int count(char c, char *str, int len);
When a multi-argument typemap is defined, the arguments are always handled as a single Tcl object. This allows the function to be used like this (notice how the length parameter is omitted):
% count e "Hello World" 1
The previous section illustrated an "in" typemap for converting Tcl objects to C. A variety of different typemap methods are defined by the Tcl module. For example, to convert a C integer back into a Tcl object, you might define an "out" typemap like this:
%typemap(out) int {
Tcl_SetObjResult(interp,Tcl_NewIntObj($1));
}
The following list details all of the typemap methods that can be used by the Tcl module:
%typemap(in)
%typemap(out)
%typemap(varin)
%typemap(varout)
%typemap(freearg)
%typemap(argout)
%typemap(ret)
%typemap(consttab)
%typemap(constcode)
%typemap(memberin)
%typemap(globalin)
%typemap(check)
%typemap(default)
%typemap(arginit)
Examples of these methods will appear shortly.
Within typemap code, a number of special variables prefaced with a $ may appear. A full list of variables can be found in the "Typemaps" chapter. This is a list of the most common variables:
$1
$input
$result
$1_name
$1_type
$1_ltype
$symname
A common problem in many C programs is the processing of command line arguments, which are usually passed in an array of NULL terminated strings. The following SWIG interface file allows a Tcl list to be used as a char ** object.
%module argv
// This tells SWIG to treat char ** as a special case
%typemap(in) char ** {
Tcl_Obj **listobjv;
int nitems;
int i;
if (Tcl_ListObjGetElements(interp, $input, &nitems, &listobjv) == TCL_ERROR) {
return TCL_ERROR;
}
$1 = (char **) malloc((nitems+1)*sizeof(char *));
for (i = 0; i < nitems; i++) {
$1[i] = Tcl_GetStringFromObj(listobjv[i],0);
}
$1[i] = 0;
}
// This gives SWIG some cleanup code that will get called after the function call
%typemap(freearg) char ** {
if ($1) {
free($1);
}
}
// Now a test functions
%inline %{
int print_args(char **argv) {
int i = 0;
while (argv[i]) {
printf("argv[%d] = %s\n", i,argv[i]);
i++;
}
return i;
}
%}
%include "tclsh.i"
In Tcl:
% print_args {John Guido Larry}
argv[0] = John
argv[1] = Guido
argv[2] = Larry
3
The "argout" typemap can be used to return a value originating from a function argument. For example :
// A typemap defining how to return an argument by appending it to the result
%typemap(argout) double *outvalue {
Tcl_Obj *o = Tcl_NewDoubleObj($1);
Tcl_ListObjAppendElement(interp,$result,o);
}
// A typemap telling SWIG to ignore an argument for input
// However, we still need to pass a pointer to the C function
%typemap(in,numinputs=0) double *outvalue (double temp) {
$1 = &temp;
}
// Now a function returning two values
int mypow(double a, double b, double *outvalue) {
if ((a < 0) || (b < 0)) return -1;
*outvalue = pow(a,b);
return 0;
};
When wrapped, SWIG matches the argout typemap to the "double *outvalue" argument. The numinputs=0 specification tells SWIG to simply ignore this argument when generating wrapper code. As a result, a Tcl function using these typemaps will work like this :
% mypow 2 3 # Returns two values, a status value and the result 0 8 %
The following tables provide some functions that may be useful in writing Tcl typemaps.
Integers
Tcl_Obj *Tcl_NewIntObj(int Value); void Tcl_SetIntObj(Tcl_Obj *obj, int Value); int Tcl_GetIntFromObj(Tcl_Interp *, Tcl_Obj *obj, int *ip);
Floating Point
Tcl_Obj *Tcl_NewDoubleObj(double Value); void Tcl_SetDoubleObj(Tcl_Obj *obj, double value); int Tcl_GetDoubleFromObj(Tcl_Interp *, Tcl_Obj *o, double *dp);
Strings
Tcl_Obj *Tcl_NewStringObj(char *str, int len); char *Tcl_GetStringFromObj(Tcl_Obj *obj, int *len); void Tcl_AppendToObj(Tcl_Obj *obj, char *str, int len);
Lists
Tcl_Obj *Tcl_NewListObj(int objc, Tcl_Obj *objv);
int Tcl_ListObjAppendList(Tcl_Interp *, Tcl_Obj *listPtr, Tcl_Obj *elemListPtr);
int Tcl_ListObjAppendElement(Tcl_Interp *, Tcl_Obj *listPtr, Tcl_Obj *element);
int Tcl_ListObjGetElements(Tcl_Interp *, Tcl_Obj *listPtr, int *objcPtr,
Tcl_Obj ***objvPtr);
int Tcl_ListObjLength(Tcl_Interp *, Tcl_Obj *listPtr, int *intPtr);
int Tcl_ListObjIndex(Tcl_Interp *, Tcl_Obj *listPtr, int index,
Tcl_Obj_Obj **objptr);
int Tcl_ListObjReplace(Tcl_Interp *, Tcl_Obj *listPtr, int first, int count,
int objc, Tcl_Obj *objv);
Objects
Tcl_Obj *Tcl_DuplicateObj(Tcl_Obj *obj); void Tcl_IncrRefCount(Tcl_Obj *obj); void Tcl_DecrRefCount(Tcl_Obj *obj); int Tcl_IsShared(Tcl_Obj *obj);
The following typemaps show how to convert a few common kinds of objects between Tcl and C (and to give a better idea of how typemaps work)
Integer conversion
%typemap(in) int, short, long {
int temp;
if (Tcl_GetIntFromObj(interp, $input, &temp) == TCL_ERROR)
return TCL_ERROR;
$1 = ($1_ltype) temp;
}
%typemap(out) int, short, long {
Tcl_SetIntObj($result,(int) $1);
}
Floating point conversion
%typemap(in) float, double {
double temp;
if (Tcl_GetDoubleFromObj(interp, $input, &temp) == TCL_ERROR)
return TCL_ERROR;
$1 = ($1_ltype) temp;
}
%typemap(out) float, double {
Tcl_SetDoubleObj($result, $1);
}
String Conversion
%typemap(in) char * {
int len;
$1 = Tcl_GetStringFromObj(interp, &len);
}
}
%typemap(out,noblock=1,fragment="SWIG_FromCharPtr") char *, const char * {
Tcl_SetObjResult(interp,SWIG_FromCharPtr((const char *)$1));
}
SWIG pointers are mapped into Tcl strings containing the hexadecimal value and type. The following functions can be used to create and read pointer values.
int SWIG_ConvertPtr(Tcl_Obj *obj, void **ptr, swig_type_info *ty, int flags)
Tcl_Obj *SWIG_NewPointerObj(void *ptr, swig_type_info *ty, int flags)
Both of these functions require the use of a special SWIG type-descriptor structure. This structure contains information about the mangled name of the datatype, type-equivalence information, as well as information about converting pointer values under C++ inheritance. For a type of Foo *, the type descriptor structure is usually accessed as follows:
Foo *f; if (SWIG_ConvertPtr($input, (void **) &f, SWIGTYPE_p_Foo, 0) == -1) return NULL; Tcl_Obj *; obj = SWIG_NewPointerObj(f, SWIGTYPE_p_Foo, 0);
In a typemap, the type descriptor should always be accessed using the special typemap variable $1_descriptor. For example:
%typemap(in) Foo * {
if ((SWIG_ConvertPtr($input,(void **) &$1, $1_descriptor,0)) == -1) return NULL;
}
If necessary, the descriptor for any type can be obtained using the $descriptor() macro in a typemap. For example:
%typemap(in) Foo * {
if ((SWIG_ConvertPtr($input,(void **) &$1, $descriptor(Foo *), 0)) == -1) return NULL;
}
Tcl 7.4 introduced the idea of an extension package. By default, SWIG generates all of the code necessary to create a package. To set the package version, simply use the -pkgversion option. For example:
% swig -tcl -pkgversion 2.3 example.i
After building the SWIG generated module, you need to execute the "pkg_mkIndex" command inside tclsh. For example :
unix > tclsh % pkg_mkIndex . example.so % exit
This creates a file "pkgIndex.tcl" with information about the package. To use your package, you now need to move it to its own subdirectory which has the same name as the package. For example :
./example/ pkgIndex.tcl # The file created by pkg_mkIndex example.so # The SWIG generated module
Finally, assuming that you're not entirely confused at this point, make sure that the example subdirectory is visible from the directories contained in either the tcl_library or auto_path variables. At this point you're ready to use the package as follows :
unix > tclsh % package require example % fact 4 24 %
If you're working with an example in the current directory and this doesn't work, do this instead :
unix > tclsh % lappend auto_path . % package require example % fact 4 24
As a final note, most SWIG examples do not yet use the package commands. For simple extensions it may be easier just to use the load command instead.
One of the most interesting aspects of Tcl and SWIG is that you can create entirely new kinds of Tcl interfaces in Tcl using the low-level SWIG accessor functions. For example, suppose you had a library of helper functions to access arrays :
/* File : array.i */
%module array
%inline %{
double *new_double(int size) {
return (double *) malloc(size*sizeof(double));
}
void delete_double(double *a) {
free(a);
}
double get_double(double *a, int index) {
return a[index];
}
void set_double(double *a, int index, double val) {
a[index] = val;
}
int *new_int(int size) {
return (int *) malloc(size*sizeof(int));
}
void delete_int(int *a) {
free(a);
}
int get_int(int *a, int index) {
return a[index];
}
int set_int(int *a, int index, int val) {
a[index] = val;
}
%}
While these could be called directly, we could also write a Tcl script like this :
proc Array {type size} {
set ptr [new_$type $size]
set code {
set method [lindex $args 0]
set parms [concat $ptr [lrange $args 1 end]]
switch $method {
get {return [eval "get_$type $parms"]}
set {return [eval "set_$type $parms"]}
delete {eval "delete_$type $ptr; rename $ptr {}"}
}
}
# Create a procedure
uplevel "proc $ptr args {set ptr $ptr; set type $type;$code}"
return $ptr
}
Our script allows easy array access as follows :
set a [Array double 100] ;# Create a double [100]
for {set i 0} {$i < 100} {incr i 1} { ;# Clear the array
$a set $i 0.0
}
$a set 3 3.1455 ;# Set an individual element
set b [$a get 10] ;# Retrieve an element
set ia [Array int 50] ;# Create an int[50]
for {set i 0} {$i < 50} {incr i 1} { ;# Clear it
$ia set $i 0
}
$ia set 3 7 ;# Set an individual element
set ib [$ia get 10] ;# Get an individual element
$a delete ;# Destroy a
$ia delete ;# Destroy ia
The cool thing about this approach is that it makes a common interface for two different types of arrays. In fact, if we were to add more C datatypes to our wrapper file, the Tcl code would work with those as well--without modification. If an unsupported datatype was requested, the Tcl code would simply return with an error so there is very little danger of blowing something up (although it is easily accomplished with an out of bounds array access).
A similar approach can be applied to proxy classes (also known as shadow classes). The following example is provided by Erik Bierwagen and Paul Saxe. To use it, run SWIG with the -noobject option (which disables the builtin object oriented interface). When running Tcl, simply source this file. Now, objects can be used in a more or less natural fashion.
# swig_c++.tcl
# Provides a simple object oriented interface using
# SWIG's low level interface.
#
proc new {objectType handle_r args} {
# Creates a new SWIG object of the given type,
# returning a handle in the variable "handle_r".
#
# Also creates a procedure for the object and a trace on
# the handle variable that deletes the object when the
# handle variable is overwritten or unset
upvar $handle_r handle
#
# Create the new object
#
eval set handle \[new_$objectType $args\]
#
# Set up the object procedure
#
proc $handle {cmd args} "eval ${objectType}_\$cmd $handle \$args"
#
# And the trace ...
#
uplevel trace variable $handle_r uw "{deleteObject $objectType $handle}"
#
# Return the handle so that 'new' can be used as an argument to a procedure
#
return $handle
}
proc deleteObject {objectType handle name element op} {
#
# Check that the object handle has a reasonable form
#
if {![regexp {_[0-9a-f]*_(.+)_p} $handle]} {
error "deleteObject: not a valid object handle: $handle"
}
#
# Remove the object procedure
#
catch {rename $handle {}}
#
# Delete the object
#
delete_$objectType $handle
}
proc delete {handle_r} {
#
# A synonym for unset that is more familiar to C++ programmers
#
uplevel unset $handle_r
}
To use this file, we simply source it and execute commands such as "new" and "delete" to manipulate objects. For example :
// list.i
%module List
%{
#include "list.h"
%}
// Very simple C++ example
class List {
public:
List(); // Create a new list
~List(); // Destroy a list
int search(char *value);
void insert(char *); // Insert a new item into the list
void remove(char *); // Remove item from list
char *get(int n); // Get the nth item in the list
int length; // The current length of the list
static void print(List *l); // Print out the contents of the list
};
Now a Tcl script using the interface...
load ./list.so list ; # Load the module source swig_c++.tcl ; # Source the object file new List l $l insert Dave $l insert John $l insert Guido $l remove Dave puts $l length_get delete l
The cool thing about this example is that it works with any C++ object wrapped by SWIG and requires no special compilation. Proof that a short, but clever Tcl script can be combined with SWIG to do many interesting things.
For background information about the Tcl Stubs feature, see http://www.tcl.tk/doc/howto/stubs.html.
As of SWIG 1.3.10, the generated C/C++ wrapper will use the Tcl Stubs feature if compiled with -DUSE_TCL_STUBS.
As of SWIG 1.3.40, the generated C/C++ wrapper will use the Tk Stubs feature if compiled with -DUSE_TK_STUBS. Also, you can override the minimum version to support which is passed to Tcl_InitStubs() and Tk_InitStubs() with -DSWIG_TCL_STUBS_VERSION="8.3" or the version being compiled with using -DSWIG_TCL_STUBS_VERSION=TCL_VERSION.