Home | Libraries | People | FAQ | More |
In this section, we'll take a look at the most common usage scenarios of the program_options library, starting with the simplest one. The examples show only the interesting code parts, but the complete programs can be found in the "BOOST_ROOT/libs/program_options/example" directory. Through all the examples, we'll assume that the following namespace alias is in effect:
namespace po = boost::program_options;
The first example is the simplest possible: it only handles two options. Here's the source code (the full program is in "example/first.cpp"):
// Declare the supported options. po::options_description desc("Allowed options"); desc.add_options() ("help", "produce help message") ("compression", po::value<int>(), "set compression level") ; po::variables_map vm; po::store(po::parse_command_line(ac, av, desc), vm); po::notify(vm); if (vm.count("help")) { cout << desc << "\n"; return 1; } if (vm.count("compression")) { cout << "Compression level was set to " << vm["compression"].as<int>() << ".\n"; } else { cout << "Compression level was not set.\n"; }
We start by declaring all allowed options using the
options_description
class. The add_options
method of that
class returns a special proxy object that defines
operator()
. Calls to that operator actually declare
options. The parameters are option name, information about value, and option
description. In this example, the first option has no value, and the second
one has a value of type int
.
After that, an object of class variables_map
is
declared. That class is intended to store values of options, and can store
values of arbitrary types. Next, the calls to store
,
parse_command_line
and notify
functions cause
vm
to contain all the options found on the command
line.
And now, finally, we can use the options as we like. The
variables_map
class can be used just like
std::map
, except that values stored there must be retrieved
with the as
method shown above. (If the type specified in the
call to the as
method is different from the actually stored
type, an exception is thrown.)
It's now a good time to try compiling the code yourself, but if you're not yet ready, here's an example session:
$bin/gcc/debug/first
Compression level was not set. $bin/gcc/debug/first --help
Allowed options: --help : produce help message --compression arg : set compression level $bin/gcc/debug/first --compression 10
Compression level was set to 10.
An option value, surely, can have other types than int
, and
can have other interesting properties, which we'll discuss right now. The
complete version of the code snipped below can be found in
"example/options_description.cpp".
Imagine we're writing a compiler. It should take the optimization level, a number of include paths, and a number of input files, and perform some interesting work. Let's describe the options:
int opt; po::options_description desc("Allowed options"); desc.add_options() ("help", "produce help message") ("optimization", po::value<int>(&opt)->default_value(10), "optimization level") ("include-path,I", po::value< vector<string> >(), "include path") ("input-file", po::value< vector<string> >(), "input file") ;
The "--help" option should be familiar from the previous example. It's a good idea to have this option in all cases.
The "optimization" option shows two new features. First, we specify
the address of the variable(&opt
). After storing values, that
variable will have the value of the option. Second, we specify a default
value of 10, which will be used if no value is specified by the user.
The "include-path" option is an example of the only case where
the interface of the options_description
class serves only one
source -- the command line. Users typically like to use short option names
for common options, and the "include-path,I" name specifies that short
option name is "I". So, both "--include-path" and "-I" can be used.
The "input-file" option specifies the list of files to process. That's okay for a start, but, of course, writing something like:
compiler --input-file=a.cpp
is a little non-standard, compared with
compiler a.cpp
We'll address this in a moment.
The command line tokens which have no option name, as above, are called "positional options" by this library. They can be handled too. With a little help from the user, the library can decide that "a.cpp" really means the same as "--input-file=a.cpp". Here's the additional code we need:
po::positional_options_description p; p.add("input-file", -1); po::variables_map vm; po::store(po::command_line_parser(ac, av). options(desc).positional(p).run(), vm); po::notify(vm);
The first two lines say that all positional options should be translated
into "input-file" options. Also note that we use the
command_line_parser
class to parse the command
line, not the parse_command_line
function. The latter is a convenient wrapper for simple cases, but now we
need to pass additional information.
By now, all options are described and parsed. We'll save ourselves the trouble of implementing the rest of the compiler logic and only print the options:
if (vm.count("include-path")) { cout << "Include paths are: " << vm["include-path"].as< vector<string> >() << "\n"; } if (vm.count("input-file")) { cout << "Input files are: " << vm["input-file"].as< vector<string> >() << "\n"; } cout << "Optimization level is " << opt << "\n";
Here's an example session:
$bin/gcc/debug/options_description --help
Usage: options_description [options] Allowed options: --help : produce help message --optimization arg : optimization level -I [ --include-path ] arg : include path --input-file arg : input file $bin/gcc/debug/options_description Optimization level is 10 $bin/gcc/debug/options_description --optimization 4 -I foo a.cpp
Include paths are: foo Input files are: a.cpp Optimization level is 4
Oops, there's a slight problem. It's still possible to specify the "--input-file" option, and usage message says so, which can be confusing for the user. It would be nice to hide this information, but let's wait for the next example.
It's quite likely that specifying all options to our compiler on the command line will annoy users. What if a user installs a new library and wants to always pass an additional command line element? What if he has made some choices which should be applied on every run? It's desirable to create a config file with common settings which will be used together with the command line.
Of course, there will be a need to combine the values from command line and config file. For example, the optimization level specified on the command line should override the value from the config file. On the other hand, include paths should be combined.
Let's see the code now. The complete program is in
"examples/multiple_sources.cpp". The option definition has two interesting
details. First, we declare several instances of the
options_description
class. The reason is that, in general,
not all options are alike. Some options, like "input-file" above, should
not be presented in an automatic help message. Some options make sense only
in the config file. Finally, it's nice to have some structure in the help message,
not just a long list of options. Let's declare several option groups:
// Declare a group of options that will be // allowed only on command line po::options_description generic("Generic options"); generic.add_options() ("version,v", "print version string") ("help", "produce help message") ; // Declare a group of options that will be // allowed both on command line and in // config file po::options_description config("Configuration"); config.add_options() ("optimization", po::value<int>(&opt)->default_value(10), "optimization level") ("include-path,I", po::value< vector<string> >()->composing(), "include path") ; // Hidden options, will be allowed both on command line and // in config file, but will not be shown to the user. po::options_description hidden("Hidden options"); hidden.add_options() ("input-file", po::value< vector<string> >(), "input file") ;
Note the call to the composing
method in the declaration of the
"include-path" option. It tells the library that values from different sources
should be composed together, as we'll see shortly.
The add
method of the options_description
class can be used to further group the options:
po::options_description cmdline_options; cmdline_options.add(generic).add(config).add(hidden); po::options_description config_file_options; config_file_options.add(config).add(hidden); po::options_description visible("Allowed options"); visible.add(generic).add(config);
The parsing and storing of values follows the usual pattern, except that
we additionally call parse_config_file
, and
call the store
function twice. But what
happens if the same value is specified both on the command line and in
config file? Usually, the value stored first is preferred. This is what
happens for the "--optimization" option. For "composing" options, like
"include-file", the values are merged.
Here's an example session:
$bin/gcc/debug/multiple_sources
Include paths are: /opt Optimization level is 1 $bin/gcc/debug/multiple_sources --help
Allows options: Generic options: -v [ --version ] : print version string --help : produce help message Configuration: --optimization n : optimization level -I [ --include-path ] path : include path $bin/gcc/debug/multiple_sources --optimization=4 -I foo a.cpp b.cpp
Include paths are: foo /opt Input files are: a.cpp b.cpp Optimization level is 4
The first invocation uses values from the configuration file. The second invocation also uses values from command line. As we see, the include paths on the command line and in the configuration file are merged, while optimization is taken from the command line.
Copyright © 2002-2004 Vladimir Prus |