BlueStore Internals¶
Small write strategies¶
- U: Uncompressed write of a complete, new blob.
- write to new blob
- kv commit
- P: Uncompressed partial write to unused region of an existing
blob.
- write to unused chunk(s) of existing blob
- kv commit
- W: WAL overwrite: commit intent to overwrite, then overwrite
async. Must be chunk_size = MAX(block_size, csum_block_size)
aligned.
- kv commit
- wal overwrite (chunk-aligned) of existing blob
- N: Uncompressed partial write to a new blob. Initially sparsely
utilized. Future writes will either be P or W.
- write into a new (sparse) blob
- kv commit
- R+W: Read partial chunk, then to WAL overwrite.
- read (out to chunk boundaries)
- kv commit
- wal overwrite (chunk-aligned) of existing blob
- C: Compress data, write to new blob.
- compress and write to new blob
- kv commit
Possible future modes¶
- F: Fragment lextent space by writing small piece of data into a
piecemeal blob (that collects random, noncontiguous bits of data we
need to write).
- write to a piecemeal blob (min_alloc_size or larger, but we use just one block of it)
- kv commit
- X: WAL read/modify/write on a single block (like legacy
bluestore). No checksum.
- kv commit
- wal read/modify/write
Mapping¶
This very roughly maps the type of write onto what we do when we encounter a given blob. In practice it’s a bit more complicated since there might be several blobs to consider (e.g., we might be able to W into one or P into another), but it should communicate a rough idea of strategy.
raw | raw (cached) | csum (4 KB) | csum (16 KB) | comp (128 KB) | |
128+ KB (over)write | U | U | U | U | C |
64 KB (over)write | U | U | U | U | U or C |
4 KB overwrite | W | P | W | P | W | P | R+W | P | N (F?) |
100 byte overwrite | R+W | P | W | P | R+W | P | R+W | P | N (F?) |
100 byte append | R+W | P | W | P | R+W | P | R+W | P | N (F?) |
4 KB clone overwrite | P | N | P | N | P | N | P | N | N (F?) |
100 byte clone overwrite | P | N | P | N | P | N | P | N | N (F?) |