Writing the contract¶
It’s easy to imagine that most CorDapps will want to impose some constraints on how their states evolve over time:
- A cash CorDapp will not want to allow users to create transactions that generate money out of thin air (at least without the involvement of a central bank or commercial bank)
- A loan CorDapp might not want to allow the creation of negative-valued loans
- An asset-trading CorDapp will not want to allow users to finalise a trade without the agreement of their counterparty
In Corda, we impose constraints on how states can evolve using contracts.
Note
Contracts in Corda are very different to the smart contracts of other distributed ledger platforms. They are not stateful objects representing the current state of the world. Instead, like a real-world contract, they simply impose rules on what kinds of transactions are allowed.
Every state has an associated contract. A transaction is invalid if it does not satisfy the contract of every input and output state in the transaction.
The Contract interface¶
Just as every Corda state must implement the ContractState
interface, every contract must implement the
Contract
interface:
interface Contract {
// Implements the contract constraints in code.
@Throws(IllegalArgumentException::class)
fun verify(tx: LedgerTransaction)
}
We can see that Contract
expresses its constraints through a verify
function that takes a transaction as input,
and:
- Throws an
IllegalArgumentException
if it rejects the transaction proposal- Returns silently if it accepts the transaction proposal
Controlling IOU evolution¶
What would a good contract for an IOUState
look like? There is no right or wrong answer - it depends on how you
want your CorDapp to behave.
For our CorDapp, let’s impose the constraint that we only want to allow the creation of IOUs. We don’t want nodes to transfer them or redeem them for cash. One way to enforce this behaviour would be by imposing the following constraints:
- A transaction involving IOUs must consume zero inputs, and create one output of type
IOUState
- The transaction should also include a
Create
command, indicating the transaction’s intent (more on commands shortly)
We might also want to impose some constraints on the properties of the issued IOUState
:
- Its value must be non-negative
- The lender and the borrower cannot be the same entity
And finally, we’ll want to impose constraints on who is required to sign the transaction:
- The IOU’s lender must sign
- The IOU’s borrower must sign
We can picture this transaction as follows:
Defining IOUContract¶
Let’s write a contract that enforces these constraints. We’ll do this by modifying either TemplateContract.java
or
App.kt
and updating TemplateContract
to define an IOUContract
:
import net.corda.core.contracts.CommandData
import net.corda.core.contracts.Contract
import net.corda.core.contracts.requireSingleCommand
import net.corda.core.contracts.requireThat
import net.corda.core.transactions.LedgerTransaction
class IOUContract : Contract {
// Our Create command.
class Create : CommandData
override fun verify(tx: LedgerTransaction) {
val command = tx.commands.requireSingleCommand<Create>()
requireThat {
// Constraints on the shape of the transaction.
"No inputs should be consumed when issuing an IOU." using (tx.inputs.isEmpty())
"There should be one output state of type IOUState." using (tx.outputs.size == 1)
// IOU-specific constraints.
val out = tx.outputsOfType<net.corda.docs.tutorial.helloworld.IOUState>().single()
"The IOU's value must be non-negative." using (out.value > 0)
"The lender and the borrower cannot be the same entity." using (out.lender != out.borrower)
// Constraints on the signers.
"There must be two signers." using (command.signers.toSet().size == 2)
"The borrower and lender must be signers." using (command.signers.containsAll(listOf(
out.borrower.owningKey, out.lender.owningKey)))
}
}
}
import com.google.common.collect.ImmutableList;
import net.corda.core.contracts.CommandData;
import net.corda.core.contracts.CommandWithParties;
import net.corda.core.contracts.Contract;
import net.corda.core.identity.Party;
import net.corda.core.transactions.LedgerTransaction;
import java.security.PublicKey;
import java.util.List;
import static net.corda.core.contracts.ContractsDSL.requireSingleCommand;
import static net.corda.core.contracts.ContractsDSL.requireThat;
public class IOUContract implements Contract {
// Our Create command.
public static class Create implements CommandData {
}
@Override
public void verify(LedgerTransaction tx) {
final CommandWithParties<IOUContract.Create> command = requireSingleCommand(tx.getCommands(), IOUContract.Create.class);
requireThat(check -> {
// Constraints on the shape of the transaction.
check.using("No inputs should be consumed when issuing an IOU.", tx.getInputs().isEmpty());
check.using("There should be one output state of type IOUState.", tx.getOutputs().size() == 1);
// IOU-specific constraints.
final IOUState out = tx.outputsOfType(IOUState.class).get(0);
final Party lender = out.getLender();
final Party borrower = out.getBorrower();
check.using("The IOU's value must be non-negative.", out.getValue() > 0);
check.using("The lender and the borrower cannot be the same entity.", lender != borrower);
// Constraints on the signers.
final List<PublicKey> signers = command.getSigners();
check.using("There must be two signers.", signers.size() == 2);
check.using("The borrower and lender must be signers.", signers.containsAll(
ImmutableList.of(borrower.getOwningKey(), lender.getOwningKey())));
return null;
});
}
}
If you’re following along in Java, you’ll also need to rename TemplateContract.java
to IOUContract.java
.
Let’s walk through this code step by step.
The Create command¶
The first thing we add to our contract is a command. Commands serve two functions:
- They indicate the transaction’s intent, allowing us to perform different verification for different types of transaction. For example, a transaction proposing the creation of an IOU could have to meet different constraints to one redeeming an IOU
- They allow us to define the required signers for the transaction. For example, IOU creation might require signatures from the lender only, whereas the transfer of an IOU might require signatures from both the IOU’s borrower and lender
Our contract has one command, a Create
command. All commands must implement the CommandData
interface.
The CommandData
interface is a simple marker interface for commands. In fact, its declaration is only two words
long (Kotlin interfaces do not require a body):
interface CommandData
The verify logic¶
Our contract also needs to define the actual contract constraints by implementing verify
. Our goal in writing the
verify
function is to write a function that, given a transaction:
- Throws an
IllegalArgumentException
if the transaction is considered invalid - Does not throw an exception if the transaction is considered valid
In deciding whether the transaction is valid, the verify
function only has access to the contents of the
transaction:
tx.inputs
, which lists the inputstx.outputs
, which lists the outputstx.commands
, which lists the commands and their associated signers
As well as to the transaction’s attachments and time-window, which we won’t use here.
Based on the constraints enumerated above, we need to write a verify
function that rejects a transaction if any of
the following are true:
- The transaction doesn’t include a
Create
command - The transaction has inputs
- The transaction doesn’t have exactly one output
- The IOU itself is invalid
- The transaction doesn’t require the lender’s signature
Command constraints¶
Our first constraint is around the transaction’s commands. We use Corda’s requireSingleCommand
function to test for
the presence of a single Create
command.
If the Create
command isn’t present, or if the transaction has multiple Create
commands, an exception will be
thrown and contract verification will fail.
Transaction constraints¶
We also want our transaction to have no inputs and only a single output - an issuance transaction.
To impose this and the subsequent constraints, we are using Corda’s built-in requireThat
block. requireThat
provides a terse way to write the following:
- If the condition on the right-hand side doesn’t evaluate to true...
- ...throw an
IllegalArgumentException
with the message on the left-hand side
As before, the act of throwing this exception causes the transaction to be considered invalid.
IOU constraints¶
We want to impose two constraints on the IOUState
itself:
- Its value must be non-negative
- The lender and the borrower cannot be the same entity
We impose these constraints in the same requireThat
block as before.
You can see that we’re not restricted to only writing constraints in the requireThat
block. We can also write
other statements - in this case, extracting the transaction’s single IOUState
and assigning it to a variable.
Signer constraints¶
Finally, we require both the lender and the borrower to be required signers on the transaction. A transaction’s
required signers is equal to the union of all the signers listed on the commands. We therefore extract the signers from
the Create
command we retrieved earlier.
This is an absolutely essential constraint - it ensures that no IOUState
can ever be created on the ledger without
the express agreement of both the lender and borrower nodes.
Progress so far¶
We’ve now written an IOUContract
constraining the evolution of each IOUState
over time:
- An
IOUState
can only be created, not transferred or redeemed - Creating an
IOUState
requires an issuance transaction with no inputs, a singleIOUState
output, and aCreate
command - The
IOUState
created by the issuance transaction must have a non-negative value, and the lender and borrower must be different entities
Next, we’ll update the IOUFlow
so that it obeys these contract constraints when issuing an IOUState
onto the
ledger.