Copyright © 2005-2006, 2012 The FreeBSD Project
Beginners may find it difficult to relate the
facts from the formal documentation on the BSD
rc.d
framework with the practical tasks
of rc.d
scripting. In this article,
we consider a few typical cases of increasing complexity,
show rc.d
features suited for each
case, and discuss how they work. Such an examination should
provide reference points for further study of the design
and efficient application of rc.d
.
The historical BSD had a monolithic startup script,
/etc/rc
. It was invoked by
init(8) at system boot time and performed all userland
tasks required for multi-user operation: checking and
mounting file systems, setting up the network, starting
daemons, and so on. The precise list of tasks was not the
same in every system; admins needed to customize it. With
few exceptions, /etc/rc
had to be modified,
and true hackers liked it.
The real problem with the monolithic approach was that
it provided no control over the individual components started
from /etc/rc
. For instance,
/etc/rc
could not restart a single daemon.
The system admin had to find the daemon process by hand, kill it,
wait until it actually exited, then browse through
/etc/rc
for the flags, and finally type
the full command line to start the daemon again. The task
would become even more difficult and prone to errors if the
service to restart consisted of more than one daemon or
demanded additional actions. In a few words, the single
script failed to fulfil what scripts are for: to make the
system admin's life easier.
Later there was an attempt to split out some parts of
/etc/rc
for the sake of starting the
most important subsystems separately. The notorious example
was /etc/netstart
to bring up networking.
It did allow for accessing the network from single-user
mode, but it did not integrate well into the automatic startup
process because parts of its code needed to interleave with
actions essentially unrelated to networking. That was why
/etc/netstart
mutated into
/etc/rc.network
. The latter was no
longer an ordinary script; it comprised of large, tangled
sh(1) functions called from /etc/rc
at different stages of system startup. However, as the startup
tasks grew diverse and sophisticated, the
“quasi-modular” approach became even more of a
drag than the monolithic /etc/rc
had
been.
Without a clean and well-designed framework, the startup
scripts had to bend over backwards to satisfy the needs of
rapidly developing BSD-based operating systems. It became
obvious at last that more steps are necessary on the way to
a fine-grained and extensible rc
system.
Thus BSD rc.d
was born. Its acknowledged
fathers were Luke Mewburn and the NetBSD community. Later
it was imported into FreeBSD. Its name refers to the location
of system scripts for individual services, which is in
/etc/rc.d
. Soon we
will learn about more components of the rc.d
system and see how the individual scripts are invoked.
The basic ideas behind BSD rc.d
are
fine modularity and code
reuse. Fine modularity means
that each basic “service” such as a system daemon
or primitive startup task gets its own sh(1) script able
to start the service, stop it, reload it, check its status.
A particular action is chosen by the command-line argument
to the script. The /etc/rc
script still
drives system startup, but now it merely invokes the smaller
scripts one by one with the start
argument.
It is easy to perform shutdown tasks as well by running the
same set of scripts with the stop
argument,
which is done by /etc/rc.shutdown
. Note
how closely this follows the Unix way of having a set of small
specialized tools, each fulfilling its task as well as possible.
Code reuse means that common operations
are implemented as sh(1) functions and collected in
/etc/rc.subr
. Now a typical script can
be just a few lines' worth of sh(1) code. Finally, an
important part of the rc.d
framework is
rcorder(8), which helps /etc/rc
to
run the small scripts orderly with respect to dependencies
between them. It can help /etc/rc.shutdown
,
too, because the proper order for the shutdown sequence is
opposite to that of startup.
The BSD rc.d
design is described in
the original article by Luke Mewburn,
and the rc.d
components are documented
in great detail in the respective
manual pages. However, it might not appear obvious
to an rc.d
newbie how to tie the numerous
bits and pieces together in order to create a well-styled
script for a particular task. Therefore this article will
try a different approach to describe rc.d
.
It will show which features should be used in a number of
typical cases, and why. Note that this is not a how-to
document because our aim is not at giving ready-made recipes,
but at showing a few easy entrances into the
rc.d
realm. Neither is this article a
replacement for the relevant manual pages. Do not hesitate
to refer to them for more formal and complete documentation
while reading this article.
There are prerequisites to understanding this article.
First of all, you should be familiar with the sh(1)
scripting language in order to master rc.d
.
In addition, you should know how the system performs
userland startup and shutdown tasks, which is described in
rc(8).
This article focuses on the FreeBSD branch of
rc.d
. Nevertheless, it may be useful
to NetBSD developers, too, because the two branches of BSD
rc.d
not only share the same design
but also stay similar in their aspects visible to script
authors.
All FreeBSD documents are available for download at http://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/doc/
Questions that are not answered by the
documentation may be
sent to <[email protected]>.
Send questions about this document to <[email protected]>.