JBoss.org Community Documentation
The JBoss client-side HA-JNDI naming Context is based on the client-side interceptor architecture. The client obtains an HA-JNDI proxy object (via the InitialContext object) and invokes JNDI lookup services on the remote server through the proxy. The client specifies that it wants an HA-JNDI proxy by configuring the naming properties used by the InitialContext object. This is covered in detail in the “Client Configuration” section. Other than the need to ensure the appropriate naming properties are provided to the InitialContext, the fact that the naming Context is using HA-JNDI is completely transparent to the client.
On the server side, he the HA-JNDI service maintains a cluster-wide context tree. The cluster wide tree is always available as long as there is one node left in the cluster. Each node in the cluster also maintains its own local JNDI context tree. The HA-JNDI service on that node is able to find objects bound into the local JNDI context tree. An application can bind its objects to either tree. The design rationale for this architecture is as follows:
It avoids migration issues with applications that assume that their JNDI implementation is local. This allows clustering to work out-of-the-box with just a few tweaks of configuration files.
In a homogeneous cluster, this configuration actually cuts down on the amount of network traffic. A homogenous cluster is one where the same types of objects are bound under the same names on each node.
Designing it in this way makes the HA-JNDI service an optional service since all underlying cluster code uses a straight new InitialContext() to lookup or create bindings.
On the server side, a naming Context obtained via a call to new InitialContext() will be bound to the local-only, non-cluster-wide JNDI Context (this is actually basic JNDI). So, all EJB homes and such will not be bound to the cluster-wide JNDI Context, but rather, each home will be bound into the local JNDI.
When a remote client does a lookup through HA-JNDI, HA-JNDI will delegate to the local JNDI Context when it cannot find the object within the global cluster-wide Context. The detailed lookup rule is as follows.
If the binding is available in the cluster-wide JNDI tree, return it.
If the binding is not in the cluster-wide tree, delegate the lookup query to the local JNDI service and return the received answer if available.
If not available, the HA-JNDI services asks all other nodes in the cluster if their local JNDI service owns such a binding and returns the answer from the set it receives.
If no local JNDI service owns such a binding, a NameNotFoundException is finally raised.
In practice, objects are rarely bound in the cluster-wide JNDI tree; rather they are bound in the local JNDI tree. For example, when EJBs are deployed, their proxies are always bound in local JNDI, not HA-JNDI. So, an EJB home lookup done through HA-JNDI will always be delegated to the local JNDI instance.
If different beans (even of the same type, but participating in different clusters) use the same JNDI name, this means that each JNDI server will have a logically different "target" bound (JNDI on node 1 will have a binding for bean A and JNDI on node 2 will have a binding, under the same name, for bean B). Consequently, if a client performs a HA-JNDI query for this name, the query will be invoked on any JNDI server of the cluster and will return the locally bound stub. Nevertheless, it may not be the correct stub that the client is expecting to receive! So, it is always best practice to ensure that across the cluster different names are used for logically different bindings.
You cannot currently use a non-JNP JNDI implementation (i.e. LDAP) for your local JNDI implementation if you want to use HA-JNDI. However, you can use JNDI federation using the ExternalContext MBean to bind non-JBoss JNDI trees into the JBoss JNDI namespace. Furthermore, nothing prevents you using one centralized JNDI server for your whole cluster and scrapping HA-JNDI and JNP.
If a binding is only made available on a few nodes in the cluster (for example because a bean is only deployed on a small subset of nodes in the cluster), the probability that a lookup will hit a HA-JNDI server that does not own this binding is higher and thus the lookup will need to be forwarded to all nodes in the cluster. Consequently, the query time will be longer than if the binding would have been available locally. Moral of the story: as much as possible, cache the result of your JNDI queries in your client.
So, an EJB home lookup through HA-JNDI, will always be delegated to the local JNDI instance. If different beans (even of the same type, but participating in different clusters) use the same JNDI name, it means that each JNDI server will have a different "target" bound (JNDI on node 1 will have a binding for bean A and JNDI on node 2 will have a binding, under the same name, for bean B). Consequently, if a client performs a HA-JNDI query for this name, the query will be invoked on any JNDI server of the cluster and will return the locally bound stub. Nevertheless, it may not be the correct stub that the client is expecting to receive!
You cannot currently use a non-JNP JNDI implementation (i.e. LDAP) for your local JNDI
implementation if you want to use HA-JNDI. However, you can use JNDI federation using the
ExternalContext MBean to bind non-JBoss JNDI trees into the JBoss JNDI
namespace. Furthermore, nothing prevents you though of using one centralized JNDI server for
your whole cluster and scrapping HA-JNDI and JNP.
If a binding is only made available on a few nodes in the cluster (for example because a bean is only deployed on a small subset of nodes in the cluster), the probability to lookup a HA-JNDI server that does not own this binding is higher and the lookup will need to be forwarded to all nodes in the cluster. Consequently, the query time will be longer than if the binding would have been available locally. Moral of the story: as much as possible, cache the result of your JNDI queries in your client.