Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > imandc | GIF version |
Description: Express implication in terms of conjunction. Theorem 3.4(27) of [Stoll] p. 176, with an added decidability condition. The forward direction, imanim 818, holds for all propositions, not just decidable ones. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Apr-2018.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
imandc | ⊢ (DECID 𝜓 → ((𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ ¬ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓))) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | notnotbdc 799 | . . 3 ⊢ (DECID 𝜓 → (𝜓 ↔ ¬ ¬ 𝜓)) | |
2 | 1 | imbi2d 228 | . 2 ⊢ (DECID 𝜓 → ((𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 → ¬ ¬ 𝜓))) |
3 | imnan 656 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 → ¬ ¬ 𝜓) ↔ ¬ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓)) | |
4 | 2, 3 | syl6bb 194 | 1 ⊢ (DECID 𝜓 → ((𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ ¬ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓))) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ∧ wa 102 ↔ wb 103 DECID wdc 775 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 5 ax-2 6 ax-mp 7 ax-ia1 104 ax-ia2 105 ax-ia3 106 ax-in1 576 ax-in2 577 ax-io 662 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 115 df-dc 776 |
This theorem is referenced by: annimdc 878 isprm3 10500 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |