| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > impbidd | GIF version | ||
| Description: Deduce an equivalence from two implications. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 12-Oct-2010.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| impbidd.1 | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) |
| impbidd.2 | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜒))) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| impbidd | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | impbidd.1 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) | |
| 2 | impbidd.2 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜒))) | |
| 3 | bi3 117 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜒 → 𝜃) → ((𝜃 → 𝜒) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))) | |
| 4 | 1, 2, 3 | syl6c 65 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 103 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 5 ax-2 6 ax-mp 7 ax-ia2 105 ax-ia3 106 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 115 |
| This theorem is referenced by: impbid21d 126 pm5.74 177 con1biimdc 800 pclem6 1305 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |