Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > nfoprab | GIF version |
Description: Bound-variable hypothesis builder for an operation class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-2013.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
nfoprab.1 | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤𝜑 |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
nfoprab | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤{〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | df-oprab 5536 | . 2 ⊢ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑣 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = 〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
2 | nfv 1461 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤 𝑣 = 〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 | |
3 | nfoprab.1 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤𝜑 | |
4 | 2, 3 | nfan 1497 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤(𝑣 = 〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∧ 𝜑) |
5 | 4 | nfex 1568 | . . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤∃𝑧(𝑣 = 〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∧ 𝜑) |
6 | 5 | nfex 1568 | . . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = 〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∧ 𝜑) |
7 | 6 | nfex 1568 | . . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = 〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∧ 𝜑) |
8 | 7 | nfab 2223 | . 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤{𝑣 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = 〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∧ 𝜑)} |
9 | 1, 8 | nfcxfr 2216 | 1 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤{〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: ∧ wa 102 = wceq 1284 Ⅎwnf 1389 ∃wex 1421 {cab 2067 Ⅎwnfc 2206 〈cop 3401 {coprab 5533 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 5 ax-2 6 ax-mp 7 ax-ia1 104 ax-ia2 105 ax-ia3 106 ax-io 662 ax-5 1376 ax-7 1377 ax-gen 1378 ax-ie1 1422 ax-ie2 1423 ax-8 1435 ax-10 1436 ax-11 1437 ax-i12 1438 ax-bndl 1439 ax-4 1440 ax-17 1459 ax-i9 1463 ax-ial 1467 ax-i5r 1468 ax-ext 2063 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 115 df-nf 1390 df-sb 1686 df-clab 2068 df-cleq 2074 df-clel 2077 df-nfc 2208 df-oprab 5536 |
This theorem is referenced by: nfmpt2 5593 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |