Axiom ax-4 1440

Description: Axiom of Specialization. A quantified wff implies the wff without a quantifier (i.e. an instance, or special case, of the generalized wff). In other words if something is true for all 𝑥, it is true for any specific 𝑥 (that would typically occur as a free variable in the wff substituted for 𝜑). (A free variable is one that does not occur in the scope of a quantifier: 𝑥 and 𝑦 are both free in 𝑥 = 𝑦, but only 𝑥 is free in ∀𝑦𝑥 = 𝑦.) Axiom scheme C5' in [Megill] p. 448 (p. 16 of the preprint). Also appears as Axiom B5 of [Tarski] p. 67 (under his system S2, defined in the last paragraph on p. 77).

Note that the converse of this axiom does not hold in general, but a weaker inference form of the converse holds and is expressed as rule ax-gen 1378. Conditional forms of the converse are given by ax-12 1442, ax-16 1735, and ax-17 1459.

Unlike the more general textbook Axiom of Specialization, we cannot choose a variable different from 𝑥 for the special case. For use, that requires the assistance of equality axioms, and we deal with it later after we introduce the definition of proper substitution - see stdpc4 1698.

(Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ax-4	⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜑)

Detailed syntax breakdown of Axiom ax-4

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		wph	. . 3 wff 𝜑
2		vx	. . 3 setvar 𝑥
3	1, 2	wal 1282	. 2 wff ∀𝑥𝜑
4	3, 1	wi 4	1 wff (∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜑)

This axiom is referenced by:  sp  1441  ax-12  1442  hbequid  1446  spi  1469  hbim  1477  19.3h  1485  19.21h  1489  19.21bi  1490  hbimd  1505  19.21ht  1513  hbnt  1583  19.12  1595  19.38  1606  ax9o  1628  hbae  1646  equveli  1682  sb2  1690  drex1  1719  ax11b  1747  a16gb  1786  sb56  1806  sb6  1807  sbalyz  1916  hbsb4t  1930  moim  2005  mopick  2019