Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > ssrab | GIF version |
Description: Subclass of a restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-2006.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
ssrab | ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | df-rab 2357 | . . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
2 | 1 | sseq2i 3024 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝐵 ⊆ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)}) |
3 | ssab 3064 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) | |
4 | dfss3 2989 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) | |
5 | 4 | anbi1i 445 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑)) |
6 | r19.26 2485 | . . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑)) | |
7 | df-ral 2353 | . . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) | |
8 | 5, 6, 7 | 3bitr2ri 207 | . 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑)) |
9 | 2, 3, 8 | 3bitri 204 | 1 ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑)) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 102 ↔ wb 103 ∀wal 1282 ∈ wcel 1433 {cab 2067 ∀wral 2348 {crab 2352 ⊆ wss 2973 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 5 ax-2 6 ax-mp 7 ax-ia1 104 ax-ia2 105 ax-ia3 106 ax-io 662 ax-5 1376 ax-7 1377 ax-gen 1378 ax-ie1 1422 ax-ie2 1423 ax-8 1435 ax-10 1436 ax-11 1437 ax-i12 1438 ax-bndl 1439 ax-4 1440 ax-17 1459 ax-i9 1463 ax-ial 1467 ax-i5r 1468 ax-ext 2063 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 115 df-nf 1390 df-sb 1686 df-clab 2068 df-cleq 2074 df-clel 2077 df-nfc 2208 df-ral 2353 df-rab 2357 df-in 2979 df-ss 2986 |
This theorem is referenced by: ssrabdv 3073 frind 4107 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |