Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > dfixp | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Eliminate the expression {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴} in df-ixp 7909, under the assumption that 𝐴 and 𝑥 are disjoint. This way, we can say that 𝑥 is bound in X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝐵 even if it appears free in 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2016.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
dfixp | ⊢ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = {𝑓 ∣ (𝑓 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑓‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐵)} |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | df-ixp 7909 | . 2 ⊢ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = {𝑓 ∣ (𝑓 Fn {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴} ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑓‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐵)} | |
2 | abid2 2745 | . . . . 5 ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴} = 𝐴 | |
3 | 2 | fneq2i 5986 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑓 Fn {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴} ↔ 𝑓 Fn 𝐴) |
4 | 3 | anbi1i 731 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝑓 Fn {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴} ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑓‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑓 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑓‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐵)) |
5 | 4 | abbii 2739 | . 2 ⊢ {𝑓 ∣ (𝑓 Fn {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴} ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑓‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐵)} = {𝑓 ∣ (𝑓 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑓‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐵)} |
6 | 1, 5 | eqtri 2644 | 1 ⊢ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = {𝑓 ∣ (𝑓 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑓‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐵)} |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: ∧ wa 384 = wceq 1483 ∈ wcel 1990 {cab 2608 ∀wral 2912 Fn wfn 5883 ‘cfv 5888 Xcixp 7908 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1722 ax-4 1737 ax-5 1839 ax-6 1888 ax-7 1935 ax-9 1999 ax-10 2019 ax-11 2034 ax-12 2047 ax-13 2246 ax-ext 2602 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 197 df-or 385 df-an 386 df-tru 1486 df-ex 1705 df-nf 1710 df-sb 1881 df-clab 2609 df-cleq 2615 df-clel 2618 df-fn 5891 df-ixp 7909 |
This theorem is referenced by: ixpsnval 7911 elixp2 7912 ixpeq1 7919 cbvixp 7925 ixp0x 7936 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |