Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > df-nf | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Define the not-free
predicate for wffs. This is read "𝑥 is not free
in 𝜑". Not-free means that the
value of 𝑥 cannot affect the
value of 𝜑, e.g., any occurrence of 𝑥 in
𝜑 is
effectively
bound by a "for all" or something that expands to one (such as
"there
exists"). In particular, substitution for a variable not free in a
wff
does not affect its value (sbf 2380). An example of where this is used is
stdpc5 2076. See nf5 2116 for an alternate definition which
involves nested
quantifiers on the same variable.
Not-free is a commonly used constraint, so it is useful to have a notation for it. Surprisingly, there is no common formal notation for it, so here we devise one. Our definition lets us work with the not-free notion within the logic itself rather than as a metalogical side condition. To be precise, our definition really means "effectively not free," because it is slightly less restrictive than the usual textbook definition for not-free (which only considers syntactic freedom). For example, 𝑥 is effectively not free in the formula 𝑥 = 𝑥 (see nfequid 1940), even though 𝑥 would be considered free in the usual textbook definition, because the value of 𝑥 in the formula 𝑥 = 𝑥 cannot affect the truth of that formula (and thus substitutions will not change the result). This definition of not-free tightly ties to the quantifier ∀𝑥. At this state (no axioms restricting quantifiers yet) 'non-free' appears quite arbitrary. Its intended semantics expresses single-valuedness (constness) across a parameter, but is only evolved as much as later axioms assign properties to quantifiers. It seems the definition here is best suited in situations, where axioms are only partially in effect. In particular, this definition more easily carries over to other logic models with weaker axiomization. The reverse implication of the definiens (the right hand side of the biconditional) always holds, see 19.2 1892. This predicate only applies to wffs. See df-nfc 2753 for a not-free predicate for class variables. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Sep-2016.) Converted to definition. (Revised by BJ, 6-May-2019.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
df-nf | ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 ↔ (∃𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | wph | . . 3 wff 𝜑 | |
2 | vx | . . 3 setvar 𝑥 | |
3 | 1, 2 | wnf 1708 | . 2 wff Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 |
4 | 1, 2 | wex 1704 | . . 3 wff ∃𝑥𝜑 |
5 | 1, 2 | wal 1481 | . . 3 wff ∀𝑥𝜑 |
6 | 4, 5 | wi 4 | . 2 wff (∃𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) |
7 | 3, 6 | wb 196 | 1 wff (Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 ↔ (∃𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
This definition is referenced by: nf2 1711 nfi 1714 nfri 1715 nfd 1716 nfrd 1717 nftht 1718 19.38a 1767 19.38b 1768 nfbiit 1777 nfimt 1821 nfnf1 2031 nf5r 2064 19.9d 2070 nfbidf 2092 nf5 2116 nf6 2117 nfnf 2158 nfeqf2 2297 sbnf2 2439 dfnf5 3952 bj-alrimhi 32604 bj-ssbft 32642 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |