| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > spei | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Inference from existential specialization, using implicit substitution. Remove a distinct variable constraint. (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 12-May-2018.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| spei.1 | ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) |
| spei.2 | ⊢ 𝜓 |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| spei | ⊢ ∃𝑥𝜑 |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ax6e 2250 | . 2 ⊢ ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 | |
| 2 | spei.2 | . . 3 ⊢ 𝜓 | |
| 3 | spei.1 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) | |
| 4 | 2, 3 | mpbiri 248 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑) |
| 5 | 1, 4 | eximii 1764 | 1 ⊢ ∃𝑥𝜑 |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 196 ∃wex 1704 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1722 ax-4 1737 ax-5 1839 ax-6 1888 ax-7 1935 ax-12 2047 ax-13 2246 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 197 df-an 386 df-ex 1705 |
| This theorem is referenced by: elirrv 8504 bnj1014 31030 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |