Theorem subtr2 32309

Description: Transitivity of implicit substitution into a wff. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 19-Sep-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
subtr.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
subtr.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
subtr2.3	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
subtr2.4	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜒
subtr2.5	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
subtr2.6	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
subtr2	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)))

Proof of Theorem subtr2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		subtr.1	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
2		subtr.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
3	1, 2	nfeq 2776	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 = 𝐵
4		subtr2.3	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
5		subtr2.4	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜒
6	4, 5	nfbi 1833	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)
7	3, 6	nfim 1825	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
8		eqeq1 2626	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 = 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
9		subtr2.5	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
10	9	bibi1d 333	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)))
11	8, 10	imbi12d 334	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))))
12		subtr2.6	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))
13	1, 7, 11, 12	vtoclgf 3264	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)))
14	13	adantr 481	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 196   ∧ wa 384   = wceq 1483  Ⅎwnf 1708   ∈ wcel 1990  Ⅎwnfc 2751

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246  ax-ext 2602

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-clab 2609  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-nfc 2753  df-v 3202

This theorem is referenced by: (None)