Theorem zfcndinf 9440

Description: Axiom of Infinity ax-inf 8535, reproved from conditionless ZFC axioms. Since we have already reproved Extensionality, Replacement, and Power Sets above, we are justified in referencing theorem el 4847 in the proof. (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 15-Aug-2003.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
zfcndinf	⊢ ∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤

Proof of Theorem zfcndinf

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		el 4847	. . 3 ⊢ ∃𝑤 𝑥 ∈ 𝑤
2		nfv 1843	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
3		nfe1 2027	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤∃𝑤(𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)
4	2, 3	nfim 1825	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦))
5	4	nfal 2153	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦))
6	2, 5	nfan 1828	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)))
7	6	nfex 2154	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)))
8		axinfnd 9428	. . . . 5 ⊢ ∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦))))
9	8	19.37iv 1911	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 → ∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦))))
10	7, 9	exlimi 2086	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑤 𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 → ∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦))))
11	1, 10	ax-mp 5	. 2 ⊢ ∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)))
12		elequ1 1997	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑥 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦))
13		elequ1 1997	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑥 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑤))
14	13	anbi1d 741	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑥 → ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)))
15	14	exbidv 1850	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑥 → (∃𝑤(𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦) ↔ ∃𝑤(𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)))
16	12, 15	imbi12d 334	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑥 → ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦))))
17	16	cbvalv 2273	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)))
18	17	anbi2i 730	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦))) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦))))
19	18	exbii 1774	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦))) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦))))
20	11, 19	mpbir 221	1 ⊢ ∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 384  ∀wal 1481   = wceq 1483  ∃wex 1704   ∈ wcel 1990

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-8 1992  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246  ax-ext 2602  ax-sep 4781  ax-nul 4789  ax-pow 4843  ax-pr 4906  ax-reg 8497  ax-inf 8535

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-clab 2609  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-nfc 2753  df-ral 2917  df-rex 2918  df-v 3202  df-dif 3577  df-un 3579  df-nul 3916  df-sn 4178  df-pr 4180

This theorem is referenced by: (None)