This section describes exactly how you define Spring managed beans in any of the supported dynamic languages.
Please note that this chapter does not attempt to explain the syntax and idioms of the supported dynamic languages. For example, if you want to use Groovy to write certain of the classes in your application, then the assumption is that you already know Groovy. If you need further details about the dynamic languages themselves, please consult Section 26.6, “Further Resources” at the end of this chapter.
The steps involved in using dynamic-language-backed beans are as follows:
Write the test for the dynamic language source code (naturally)
Then write the dynamic language source code itself :)
Define your dynamic-language-backed beans using the appropriate
<lang:language/>
element in the XML
configuration (you can of course define such beans programmatically
using the Spring API - although you will have to consult the source
code for directions on how to do this as this type of advanced
configuration is not covered in this chapter). Note this is an iterative
step. You will need at least one bean definition per dynamic
language source file (although the same dynamic language source
file can of course be referenced by multiple bean definitions).
The first two steps (testing and writing your dynamic language source files) are beyond the scope of this chapter. Refer to the language specification and / or reference manual for your chosen dynamic language and crack on with developing your dynamic language source files. You will first want to read the rest of this chapter though, as Spring's dynamic language support does make some (small) assumptions about the contents of your dynamic language source files.
The final step involves defining dynamic-language-backed bean definitions,
one for each bean that you want to configure (this is no different to
normal JavaBean configuration). However, instead of specifying the
fully qualified classname of the class that is to be instantiated and
configured by the container, you use the <lang:language/>
element to define the dynamic language-backed bean.
Each of the supported languages has a corresponding
<lang:language/>
element:
<lang:jruby/>
(JRuby)
<lang:groovy/>
(Groovy)
<lang:bsh/>
(BeanShell)
The exact attributes and child elements that are available for configuration depends on exactly which language the bean has been defined in (the language-specific sections below provide the full lowdown on this).
One of the (if not the) most compelling value adds of the dynamic language support in Spring is the 'refreshable bean' feature.
A refreshable bean is a dynamic-language-backed bean that with a small amount of configuration, a dynamic-language-backed bean can monitor changes in its underlying source file resource, and then reload itself when the dynamic language source file is changed (for example when a developer edits and saves changes to the file on the filesystem).
This allows a developer to deploy any number of dynamic language source files as part of an application, configure the Spring container to create beans backed by dynamic language source files (using the mechanisms described in this chapter), and then later, as requirements change or some other external factor comes into play, simply edit a dynamic language source file and have any change they make reflected in the bean that is backed by the changed dynamic language source file. There is no need to shut down a running application (or redeploy in the case of a web application). The dynamic-language-backed bean so amended will pick up the new state and logic from the changed dynamic language source file.
Note | |
---|---|
Please note that this feature is off by default. |
Let's take a look at an example to see just how easy it is to start using
refreshable beans. To turn on the refreshable beans
feature, you simply have to specify exactly one
additional attribute on the <lang:language/>
element
of your bean definition. So if we stick with
the example from earlier
in this chapter, here's what we would change in the Spring XML configuration
to effect refreshable beans:
<beans> <!-- this bean is now 'refreshable' due to the presence of the 'refresh-check-delay' attribute --> <lang:groovy id="messenger" refresh-check-delay="5000" <!-- switches refreshing on with 5 seconds between checks --> script-source="classpath:Messenger.groovy"> <lang:property name="message" value="I Can Do The Frug" /> </lang:groovy> <bean id="bookingService" class="x.y.DefaultBookingService"> <property name="messenger" ref="messenger" /> </bean> </beans>
That really is all you have to do. The 'refresh-check-delay'
attribute defined on the 'messenger'
bean definition
is the number of milliseconds after which the bean will be refreshed with
any changes made to the underlying dynamic language source file.
You can turn off the refresh behavior by assigning a negative value
to the 'refresh-check-delay'
attribute.
Remember that, by default, the refresh behavior is disabled. If you don't
want the refresh behavior, then simply don't define the attribute.
If we then run the following application we can exercise the refreshable feature;
please do excuse the 'jumping-through-hoops-to-pause-the-execution'
shenanigans in this next slice of code. The System.in.read()
call is only there so that the execution of the program pauses while I (the author)
go off and edit the underlying dynamic language source file so that the refresh will
trigger on the dynamic-language-backed bean when the program resumes execution.
import org.springframework.context.ApplicationContext; import org.springframework.context.support.ClassPathXmlApplicationContext; import org.springframework.scripting.Messenger; public final class Boot { public static void main(final String[] args) throws Exception { ApplicationContext ctx = new ClassPathXmlApplicationContext("beans.xml"); Messenger messenger = (Messenger) ctx.getBean("messenger"); System.out.println(messenger.getMessage()); // pause execution while I go off and make changes to the source file... System.in.read(); System.out.println(messenger.getMessage()); } }
Let's assume then, for the purposes of this example, that all
calls to the getMessage()
method of
Messenger
implementations have to be
changed such that the message is surrounded by quotes.
Below are the changes that I (the author) make to the
Messenger.groovy
source file when the execution of
the program is paused.
package org.springframework.scripting class GroovyMessenger implements Messenger { private String message = "Bingo" public String getMessage() { // change the implementation to surround the message in quotes return "'" + this.message + "'" } public void setMessage(String message) { this.message = message } }
When the program executes, the output before the input pause will be
I Can Do The Frug
. After the change
to the source file is made and saved, and the program resumes execution,
the result of calling the getMessage()
method on the
dynamic-language-backed Messenger
implementation
will be 'I Can Do The Frug'
(notice
the inclusion of the additional quotes).
It is important to understand that changes to a script will
not trigger a refresh if the changes occur
within the window of the 'refresh-check-delay'
value.
It is equally important to understand that changes to the script are
not actually 'picked up' until a method is called
on the dynamic-language-backed bean. It is only when a method is called on a
dynamic-language-backed bean that it checks to see if its underlying script
source has changed. Any exceptions relating to refreshing the script
(such as encountering a compilation error, or finding that the script
file has been deleted) will result in a fatal
exception being propagated to the calling code.
The refreshable bean behavior described above does
not apply to dynamic language source files
defined using the <lang:inline-script/>
element
notation (see Section 26.3.1.3, “Inline dynamic language source files”).
Additionally, it only applies to beans where
changes to the underlying source file can actually be detected;
for example, by code that checks the last modified date of a
dynamic language source file that exists on the filesystem.
The dynamic language support can also cater for dynamic language
source files that are embedded directly in Spring bean definitions.
More specifically, the <lang:inline-script/>
element allows you to define dynamic language source immediately
inside a Spring configuration file. An example will perhaps make the
inline script feature crystal clear:
<lang:groovy id="messenger"> <lang:inline-script> package org.springframework.scripting.groovy; import org.springframework.scripting.Messenger class GroovyMessenger implements Messenger { String message } </lang:inline-script> <lang:property name="message" value="I Can Do The Frug" /> </lang:groovy>
If we put to one side the issues surrounding whether it is good practice
to define dynamic language source inside a Spring configuration file, the
<lang:inline-script/>
element can be useful in
some scenarios. For instance, we might want to quickly add a Spring
Validator
implementation to a Spring MVC
Controller
. This is but a moment's work
using inline source. (See Section 26.4.2, “Scripted Validators”
for such an example.)
Find below an example of defining the source for a JRuby-based bean
directly in a Spring XML configuration file using the
inline:
notation. (Notice the use of the <
characters to denote a '<'
character. In such a case
surrounding the inline source in a <![CDATA[]]>
region might be better.)
<lang:jruby id="messenger" script-interfaces="org.springframework.scripting.Messenger"> <lang:inline-script> require 'java' include_class 'org.springframework.scripting.Messenger' class RubyMessenger < Messenger def setMessage(message) @@message = message end def getMessage @@message end end </lang:inline-script> <lang:property name="message" value="Hello World!" /> </lang:jruby>
There is one very important thing to be aware of with regard to Spring's dynamic language support. Namely, it is not (currently) possible to supply constructor arguments to dynamic-language-backed beans (and hence constructor-injection is not available for dynamic-language-backed beans). In the interests of making this special handling of constructors and properties 100% clear, the following mixture of code and configuration will not work.
// from the file 'Messenger.groovy' package org.springframework.scripting.groovy; import org.springframework.scripting.Messenger class GroovyMessenger implements Messenger { GroovyMessenger() {} // this constructor is not available for Constructor Injection GroovyMessenger(String message) { this.message = message; } String message String anotherMessage }
<lang:groovy id="badMessenger" script-source="classpath:Messenger.groovy"> <!-- this next constructor argument will *not* be injected into the GroovyMessenger --> <!-- in fact, this isn't even allowed according to the schema --> <constructor-arg value="This will *not* work" /> <!-- only property values are injected into the dynamic-language-backed object --> <lang:property name="anotherMessage" value="Passed straight through to the dynamic-language-backed object" /> </lang>
In practice this limitation is not as significant as it first appears since setter injection is the injection style favored by the overwhelming majority of developers anyway (let's leave the discussion as to whether that is a good thing to another day).
From the JRuby homepage...
“ JRuby is an 100% pure-Java implementation of the Ruby programming language. ”In keeping with the Spring philosophy of offering choice, Spring's dynamic language support also supports beans defined in the JRuby language. The JRuby language is based on the quite intuitive Ruby language, and has support for inline regular expressions, blocks (closures), and a whole host of other features that do make solutions for some domain problems a whole lot easier to develop.
The implementation of the JRuby dynamic language support in Spring is
interesting in that what happens is this: Spring creates a JDK dynamic
proxy implementing all of the interfaces that are specified in the
'script-interfaces'
attribute value of the
<lang:ruby>
element (this is why
you must supply at least one interface in the value
of the attribute, and (accordingly) program to interfaces when using
JRuby-backed beans).
Let us look at a fully working example of using a JRuby-based bean. Here is
the JRuby implementation of the Messenger
interface that was defined earlier in this chapter (for your convenience it
is repeated below).
package org.springframework.scripting; public interface Messenger { String getMessage(); }
require 'java' class RubyMessenger include org.springframework.scripting.Messenger def setMessage(message) @@message = message end def getMessage @@message end end # this last line is not essential (but see below) RubyMessenger.new
And here is the Spring XML that defines an instance of the
RubyMessenger
JRuby bean.
<lang:jruby id="messageService" script-interfaces="org.springframework.scripting.Messenger" script-source="classpath:RubyMessenger.rb"> <lang:property name="message" value="Hello World!" /> </lang:jruby>
Take note of the last line of that JRuby source ('RubyMessenger.new'
).
When using JRuby in the context of Spring's dynamic language support, you are encouraged
to instantiate and return a new instance of the JRuby class that you want to use as a
dynamic-language-backed bean as the result of the execution of your JRuby source. You
can achieve this by simply instantiating a new instance of your JRuby class on the last
line of the source file like so:
require 'java' include_class 'org.springframework.scripting.Messenger' # class definition same as above... # instantiate and return a new instance of the RubyMessenger class RubyMessenger.new
If you forget to do this, it is not the end of the world; this will however result in
Spring having to trawl (reflectively) through the type representation of your JRuby class
looking for a class to instantiate. In the grand scheme of things this will be so fast
that you'll never notice it, but it is something that can be avoided by simply
having a line such as the one above as the last line of your JRuby script. If you don't
supply such a line, or if Spring cannot find a JRuby class in your script to instantiate
then an opaque ScriptCompilationException
will be thrown immediately after the source is executed by the JRuby
interpreter. The key text that identifies this as the root cause of an
exception can be found immediately below (so if your Spring container
throws the following exception when creating your dynamic-language-backed bean
and the following text is there in the corresponding stacktrace, this will hopefully
allow you to identify and then easily rectify the issue):
org.springframework.scripting.ScriptCompilationException: Compilation of JRuby script returned ''
To rectify this, simply instantiate a new instance of whichever class you want to expose as a JRuby-dynamic-language-backed bean (as shown above). Please also note that you can actually define as many classes and objects as you want in your JRuby script; what is important is that the source file as a whole must return an object (for Spring to configure).
See Section 26.4, “Scenarios” for some scenarios where you might want to use JRuby-based beans.
From the Groovy homepage...
“ Groovy is an agile dynamic language for the Java 2 Platform that has many of the features that people like so much in languages like Python, Ruby and Smalltalk, making them available to Java developers using a Java-like syntax. ”If you have read this chapter straight from the top, you will already have seen an example of a Groovy-dynamic-language-backed bean. Let's look at another example (again using an example from the Spring test suite).
package org.springframework.scripting; public interface Calculator { int add(int x, int y); }
Here is an implementation of the Calculator
interface in Groovy.
// from the file 'calculator.groovy'
package org.springframework.scripting.groovy
class GroovyCalculator implements Calculator {
int add(int x, int y) {
x + y
}
}
<-- from the file 'beans.xml' --> <beans> <lang:groovy id="calculator" script-source="classpath:calculator.groovy"/> </beans>
Lastly, here is a small application to exercise the above configuration.
package org.springframework.scripting; import org.springframework.context.ApplicationContext; import org.springframework.context.support.ClassPathXmlApplicationContext; public class Main { public static void Main(String[] args) { ApplicationContext ctx = new ClassPathXmlApplicationContext("beans.xml"); Calculator calc = (Calculator) ctx.getBean("calculator"); System.out.println(calc.add(2, 8)); } }
The resulting output from running the above program will be
(unsurprisingly) 10
.
(Exciting example, huh? Remember that the intent is to illustrate the
concept. Please consult the dynamic language showcase project for a
more complex example, or indeed Section 26.4, “Scenarios”
later in this chapter).
It is important that you do not define more than one class per Groovy source file. While this is perfectly legal in Groovy, it is (arguably) a bad practice: in the interests of a consistent approach, you should (in the opinion of this author) respect the standard Java conventions of one (public) class per source file.
The GroovyObjectCustomizer
interface is a callback that allows you to hook additional
creation logic into the process of creating a Groovy-backed bean.
For example, implementations of this interface could invoke
any required initialization method(s), or set some default property
values, or specify a custom MetaClass
.
public interface GroovyObjectCustomizer { void customize(GroovyObject goo); }
The Spring Framework will instantiate an instance of your Groovy-backed
bean, and will then pass the created GroovyObject
to the specified GroovyObjectCustomizer
if one has been defined. You can do whatever you like with the supplied
GroovyObject
reference: it is expected
that the setting of a custom MetaClass
is what most
folks will want to do with this callback, and you can see an example
of doing that below.
public final class SimpleMethodTracingCustomizer implements GroovyObjectCustomizer { public void customize(GroovyObject goo) { DelegatingMetaClass metaClass = new DelegatingMetaClass(goo.getMetaClass()) { public Object invokeMethod(Object object, String methodName, Object[] arguments) { System.out.println("Invoking '" + methodName + "'."); return super.invokeMethod(object, methodName, arguments); } }; metaClass.initialize(); goo.setMetaClass(metaClass); } }
A full discussion of meta-programming in Groovy is beyond the scope of the
Spring reference manual. Consult the relevant section of the Groovy
reference manual, or do a search online: there are plenty of articles
concerning this topic.
Actually making use of a GroovyObjectCustomizer
is easy if you are using the Spring 2.0 namespace support.
<!-- define the GroovyObjectCustomizer just like any other bean --> <bean id="tracingCustomizer" class="example.SimpleMethodTracingCustomizer" /> <!-- ... and plug it into the desired Groovy bean via the 'customizer-ref' attribute --> <lang:groovy id="calculator" script-source="classpath:org/springframework/scripting/groovy/Calculator.groovy" customizer-ref="tracingCustomizer" />
If you are not using the Spring 2.0 namespace support, you can still
use the GroovyObjectCustomizer
functionality.
<bean id="calculator" class="org.springframework.scripting.groovy.GroovyScriptFactory"> <constructor-arg value="classpath:org/springframework/scripting/groovy/Calculator.groovy"/> <!-- define the GroovyObjectCustomizer (as an inner bean) --> <constructor-arg> <bean id="tracingCustomizer" class="example.SimpleMethodTracingCustomizer" /> </constructor-arg> </bean> <bean class="org.springframework.scripting.support.ScriptFactoryPostProcessor"/>
From the BeanShell homepage...
“ BeanShell is a small, free, embeddable Java source interpreter with dynamic language features, written in Java. BeanShell dynamically executes standard Java syntax and extends it with common scripting conveniences such as loose types, commands, and method closures like those in Perl and JavaScript. ”
In contrast to Groovy, BeanShell-backed bean definitions require some (small)
additional configuration. The implementation of the BeanShell dynamic language
support in Spring is interesting in that what happens is this: Spring creates
a JDK dynamic proxy implementing all of the interfaces that are specified in the
'script-interfaces'
attribute value of the
<lang:bsh>
element (this is why
you must supply at least one interface in the value
of the attribute, and (accordingly) program to interfaces when using
BeanShell-backed beans). This means that every method call on a BeanShell-backed
object is going through the JDK dynamic proxy invocation mechanism.
Let's look at a fully working example of using a BeanShell-based bean
that implements the Messenger
interface
that was defined earlier in this chapter (repeated below for your
convenience).
package org.springframework.scripting; public interface Messenger { String getMessage(); }
Here is the BeanShell 'implementation' (the term is used loosely here) of the
Messenger
interface.
String message; String getMessage() { return message; } void setMessage(String aMessage) { message = aMessage; }
And here is the Spring XML that defines an 'instance' of the above 'class' (again, the term is used very loosely here).
<lang:bsh id="messageService" script-source="classpath:BshMessenger.bsh" script-interfaces="org.springframework.scripting.Messenger"> <lang:property name="message" value="Hello World!" /> </lang:bsh>
See Section 26.4, “Scenarios” for some scenarios where you might want to use BeanShell-based beans.