Theorem dvelim 1934

Description: This theorem can be used to eliminate a distinct variable restriction on x and z and replace it with the "distinctor" -. A. x x = y as an antecedent. ph normally has z free and can be read ph ( z ), and ps substitutes y for z and can be read ph ( y ). We don't require that x and y be distinct: if they aren't, the distinctor will become false (in multiple-element domains of discourse) and "protect" the consequent.

To obtain a closed-theorem form of this inference, prefix the hypotheses with A. x A. z, conjoin them, and apply dvelimdf 1933.

Other variants of this theorem are dvelimf 1932 (with no distinct variable restrictions) and dvelimALT 1927 (that avoids ax-10 1436). (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
dvelim.1	|- ( ph -> A. x ph )
dvelim.2	|- ( z = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dvelim	|- ( -. A. x x = y -> ( ps -> A. x ps ) )

Distinct variable group:   ps, z

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x, y, z)   ps( x, y)

Proof of Theorem dvelim

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dvelim.1	. 2 |- ( ph -> A. x ph )
2		ax-17 1459	. 2 |- ( ps -> A. z ps )
3		dvelim.2	. 2 |- ( z = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )
4	1, 2, 3	dvelimf 1932	1 |- ( -. A. x x = y -> ( ps -> A. x ps ) )

Syntax hints:   -. wn 3   -> wi 4   <-> wb 103   A.wal 1282

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-in2 577  ax-io 662  ax-5 1376  ax-7 1377  ax-gen 1378  ax-ie1 1422  ax-ie2 1423  ax-8 1435  ax-10 1436  ax-11 1437  ax-i12 1438  ax-bndl 1439  ax-4 1440  ax-17 1459  ax-i9 1463  ax-ial 1467  ax-i5r 1468

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-nf 1390  df-sb 1686

This theorem is referenced by: (None)