Theorem nfcrii 2212

Description: Consequence of the not-free predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
nfcri.1	|- F/_ x A

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nfcrii	|- ( y e. A -> A. x y e. A )

Distinct variable group:   x, y

Allowed substitution hints:   A( x, y)

Proof of Theorem nfcrii

Dummy variable z is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfcri.1	. . . 4 |- F/_ x A
2		nfcr 2211	. . . 4 |- ( F/_ x A -> F/ x z e. A )
3	1, 2	ax-mp 7	. . 3 |- F/ x z e. A
4	3	nfri 1452	. 2 |- ( z e. A -> A. x z e. A )
5	4	hblem 2186	1 |- ( y e. A -> A. x y e. A )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   A.wal 1282   F/wnf 1389   e. wcel 1433   F/_wnfc 2206

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-io 662  ax-5 1376  ax-7 1377  ax-gen 1378  ax-ie1 1422  ax-ie2 1423  ax-8 1435  ax-10 1436  ax-11 1437  ax-i12 1438  ax-bndl 1439  ax-4 1440  ax-17 1459  ax-i9 1463  ax-ial 1467  ax-i5r 1468  ax-ext 2063

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-nf 1390  df-sb 1686  df-cleq 2074  df-clel 2077  df-nfc 2208

This theorem is referenced by:  nfcri  2213