Theorem opabbid 3843

Description: Equivalent wff's yield equal ordered-pair class abstractions (deduction rule). (Contributed by NM, 21-Feb-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jul-2011.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
opabbid.1	|- F/ x ph
opabbid.2	|- F/ y ph
opabbid.3	|- ( ph -> ( ps <-> ch ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
opabbid	|- ( ph -> { <. x , y >. | ps } = { <. x , y >. | ch } )

Proof of Theorem opabbid

Dummy variable z is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		opabbid.1	. . . 4 |- F/ x ph
2		opabbid.2	. . . . 5 |- F/ y ph
3		opabbid.3	. . . . . 6 |- ( ph -> ( ps <-> ch ) )
4	3	anbi2d 451	. . . . 5 |- ( ph -> ( ( z = <. x , y >. /\ ps ) <-> ( z = <. x , y >. /\ ch ) ) )
5	2, 4	exbid 1547	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> ( E. y ( z = <. x , y >. /\ ps ) <-> E. y ( z = <. x , y >. /\ ch ) ) )
6	1, 5	exbid 1547	. . 3 |- ( ph -> ( E. x E. y ( z = <. x , y >. /\ ps ) <-> E. x E. y ( z = <. x , y >. /\ ch ) ) )
7	6	abbidv 2196	. 2 |- ( ph -> { z | E. x E. y ( z = <. x , y >. /\ ps ) } = { z | E. x E. y ( z = <. x , y >. /\ ch ) } )
8		df-opab 3840	. 2 |- { <. x , y >. | ps } = { z | E. x E. y ( z = <. x , y >. /\ ps ) }
9		df-opab 3840	. 2 |- { <. x , y >. | ch } = { z | E. x E. y ( z = <. x , y >. /\ ch ) }
10	7, 8, 9	3eqtr4g 2138	1 |- ( ph -> { <. x , y >. | ps } = { <. x , y >. | ch } )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 102   <-> wb 103   = wceq 1284   F/wnf 1389   E.wex 1421   {cab 2067   <.cop 3401   {copab 3838

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-5 1376  ax-7 1377  ax-gen 1378  ax-ie1 1422  ax-ie2 1423  ax-8 1435  ax-11 1437  ax-4 1440  ax-17 1459  ax-i9 1463  ax-ial 1467  ax-i5r 1468  ax-ext 2063

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-tru 1287  df-nf 1390  df-sb 1686  df-clab 2068  df-cleq 2074  df-opab 3840

This theorem is referenced by:  opabbidv  3844  mpteq12f  3858  fnoprabg  5622