Theorem opabbid 3843

Description: Equivalent wff's yield equal ordered-pair class abstractions (deduction rule). (Contributed by NM, 21-Feb-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jul-2011.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
opabbid.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
opabbid.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑
opabbid.3	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
opabbid	⊢ (𝜑 → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜒})

Proof of Theorem opabbid

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		opabbid.1	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
2		opabbid.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑
3		opabbid.3	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
4	3	anbi2d 451	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜒)))
5	2, 4	exbid 1547	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜒)))
6	1, 5	exbid 1547	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜒)))
7	6	abbidv 2196	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓)} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜒)})
8		df-opab 3840	. 2 ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓)}
9		df-opab 3840	. 2 ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜒} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜒)}
10	7, 8, 9	3eqtr4g 2138	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜒})

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 102   ↔ wb 103   = wceq 1284  Ⅎwnf 1389  ∃wex 1421  {cab 2067  ⟨cop 3401  {copab 3838

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-5 1376  ax-7 1377  ax-gen 1378  ax-ie1 1422  ax-ie2 1423  ax-8 1435  ax-11 1437  ax-4 1440  ax-17 1459  ax-i9 1463  ax-ial 1467  ax-i5r 1468  ax-ext 2063

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-tru 1287  df-nf 1390  df-sb 1686  df-clab 2068  df-cleq 2074  df-opab 3840

This theorem is referenced by:  opabbidv  3844  mpteq12f  3858  fnoprabg  5622