Theorem rspc2 2711

Description: 2-variable restricted specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 9-Nov-2012.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
rspc2.1	|- F/ x ch
rspc2.2	|- F/ y ps
rspc2.3	|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ch ) )
rspc2.4	|- ( y = B -> ( ch <-> ps ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rspc2	|- ( ( A e. C /\ B e. D ) -> ( A. x e. C A. y e. D ph -> ps ) )

Distinct variable groups:   x, y, A   y, B   x, C   x, D, y

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x, y)   ps( x, y)   ch( x, y)   B( x)   C( y)

Proof of Theorem rspc2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfcv 2219	. . . 4 |- F/_ x D
2		rspc2.1	. . . 4 |- F/ x ch
3	1, 2	nfralxy 2402	. . 3 |- F/ x A. y e. D ch
4		rspc2.3	. . . 4 |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ch ) )
5	4	ralbidv 2368	. . 3 |- ( x = A -> ( A. y e. D ph <-> A. y e. D ch ) )
6	3, 5	rspc 2695	. 2 |- ( A e. C -> ( A. x e. C A. y e. D ph -> A. y e. D ch ) )
7		rspc2.2	. . 3 |- F/ y ps
8		rspc2.4	. . 3 |- ( y = B -> ( ch <-> ps ) )
9	7, 8	rspc 2695	. 2 |- ( B e. D -> ( A. y e. D ch -> ps ) )
10	6, 9	sylan9 401	1 |- ( ( A e. C /\ B e. D ) -> ( A. x e. C A. y e. D ph -> ps ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 102   <-> wb 103   = wceq 1284   F/wnf 1389   e. wcel 1433   A.wral 2348

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-io 662  ax-5 1376  ax-7 1377  ax-gen 1378  ax-ie1 1422  ax-ie2 1423  ax-8 1435  ax-10 1436  ax-11 1437  ax-i12 1438  ax-bndl 1439  ax-4 1440  ax-17 1459  ax-i9 1463  ax-ial 1467  ax-i5r 1468  ax-ext 2063

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-tru 1287  df-nf 1390  df-sb 1686  df-clab 2068  df-cleq 2074  df-clel 2077  df-nfc 2208  df-ral 2353  df-v 2603

This theorem is referenced by:  rspc2v  2713