Theorem setindft 10760

Description: Axiom of set-induction with a DV condition replaced with a non-freeness hypothesis (Contributed by BJ, 22-Nov-2019.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
setindft	|- ( A. x F/ y ph -> ( A. x ( A. y e. x [ y / x ] ph -> ph ) -> A. x ph ) )

Distinct variable group:   x, y

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x, y)

Proof of Theorem setindft

Dummy variable z is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfa1 1474	. . 3 |- F/ x A. x F/ y ph
2		nfv 1461	. . . . . 6 |- F/ z A. x F/ y ph
3		nfnf1 1476	. . . . . . 7 |- F/ y F/ y ph
4	3	nfal 1508	. . . . . 6 |- F/ y A. x F/ y ph
5		nfsbt 1891	. . . . . 6 |- ( A. x F/ y ph -> F/ y [ z / x ] ph )
6		nfv 1461	. . . . . . 7 |- F/ z [ y / x ] ph
7	6	a1i 9	. . . . . 6 |- ( A. x F/ y ph -> F/ z [ y / x ] ph )
8		sbequ 1761	. . . . . . 7 |- ( z = y -> ( [ z / x ] ph <-> [ y / x ] ph ) )
9	8	a1i 9	. . . . . 6 |- ( A. x F/ y ph -> ( z = y -> ( [ z / x ] ph <-> [ y / x ] ph ) ) )
10	2, 4, 5, 7, 9	cbvrald 10598	. . . . 5 |- ( A. x F/ y ph -> ( A. z e. x [ z / x ] ph <-> A. y e. x [ y / x ] ph ) )
11	10	biimpd 142	. . . 4 |- ( A. x F/ y ph -> ( A. z e. x [ z / x ] ph -> A. y e. x [ y / x ] ph ) )
12	11	imim1d 74	. . 3 |- ( A. x F/ y ph -> ( ( A. y e. x [ y / x ] ph -> ph ) -> ( A. z e. x [ z / x ] ph -> ph ) ) )
13	1, 12	alimd 1454	. 2 |- ( A. x F/ y ph -> ( A. x ( A. y e. x [ y / x ] ph -> ph ) -> A. x ( A. z e. x [ z / x ] ph -> ph ) ) )
14		ax-setind 4280	. 2 |- ( A. x ( A. z e. x [ z / x ] ph -> ph ) -> A. x ph )
15	13, 14	syl6 33	1 |- ( A. x F/ y ph -> ( A. x ( A. y e. x [ y / x ] ph -> ph ) -> A. x ph ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   <-> wb 103   A.wal 1282   F/wnf 1389   [wsb 1685   A.wral 2348

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-io 662  ax-5 1376  ax-7 1377  ax-gen 1378  ax-ie1 1422  ax-ie2 1423  ax-8 1435  ax-10 1436  ax-11 1437  ax-i12 1438  ax-bndl 1439  ax-4 1440  ax-17 1459  ax-i9 1463  ax-ial 1467  ax-i5r 1468  ax-ext 2063  ax-setind 4280

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-nf 1390  df-sb 1686  df-cleq 2074  df-clel 2077  df-ral 2353

This theorem is referenced by:  setindf  10761