ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  unjust Unicode version

Theorem unjust 2976
Description: Soundness justification theorem for df-un 2977. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 28-Apr-2010.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jul-2011.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
unjust  |-  { x  |  ( x  e.  A  \/  x  e.  B ) }  =  { y  |  ( y  e.  A  \/  y  e.  B ) }
Distinct variable groups:    x, A    x, B    y, A    y, B

Proof of Theorem unjust
Dummy variable  z is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 eleq1 2141 . . . 4  |-  ( x  =  z  ->  (
x  e.  A  <->  z  e.  A ) )
2 eleq1 2141 . . . 4  |-  ( x  =  z  ->  (
x  e.  B  <->  z  e.  B ) )
31, 2orbi12d 739 . . 3  |-  ( x  =  z  ->  (
( x  e.  A  \/  x  e.  B
)  <->  ( z  e.  A  \/  z  e.  B ) ) )
43cbvabv 2202 . 2  |-  { x  |  ( x  e.  A  \/  x  e.  B ) }  =  { z  |  ( z  e.  A  \/  z  e.  B ) }
5 eleq1 2141 . . . 4  |-  ( z  =  y  ->  (
z  e.  A  <->  y  e.  A ) )
6 eleq1 2141 . . . 4  |-  ( z  =  y  ->  (
z  e.  B  <->  y  e.  B ) )
75, 6orbi12d 739 . . 3  |-  ( z  =  y  ->  (
( z  e.  A  \/  z  e.  B
)  <->  ( y  e.  A  \/  y  e.  B ) ) )
87cbvabv 2202 . 2  |-  { z  |  ( z  e.  A  \/  z  e.  B ) }  =  { y  |  ( y  e.  A  \/  y  e.  B ) }
94, 8eqtri 2101 1  |-  { x  |  ( x  e.  A  \/  x  e.  B ) }  =  { y  |  ( y  e.  A  \/  y  e.  B ) }
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:    \/ wo 661    = wceq 1284    e. wcel 1433   {cab 2067
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-io 662  ax-5 1376  ax-7 1377  ax-gen 1378  ax-ie1 1422  ax-ie2 1423  ax-8 1435  ax-10 1436  ax-11 1437  ax-i12 1438  ax-bndl 1439  ax-4 1440  ax-17 1459  ax-i9 1463  ax-ial 1467  ax-i5r 1468  ax-ext 2063
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-nf 1390  df-sb 1686  df-clab 2068  df-cleq 2074  df-clel 2077
This theorem is referenced by: (None)
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator