Theorem bj-dfom 10728

Description: Alternate definition of ω, as the intersection of all the inductive sets. Proposal: make this the definition. (Contributed by BJ, 30-Nov-2019.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-dfom	⊢ ω = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ Ind 𝑥}

Proof of Theorem bj-dfom

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dfom3 4333	. 2 ⊢ ω = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (∅ ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 suc 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)}
2		df-bj-ind 10722	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Ind 𝑥 ↔ (∅ ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 suc 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥))
3	2	bicomi 130	. . . 4 ⊢ ((∅ ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 suc 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ Ind 𝑥)
4	3	abbii 2194	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (∅ ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 suc 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)} = {𝑥 ∣ Ind 𝑥}
5	4	inteqi 3640	. 2 ⊢ ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (∅ ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 suc 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)} = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ Ind 𝑥}
6	1, 5	eqtri 2101	1 ⊢ ω = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ Ind 𝑥}

Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 102   = wceq 1284   ∈ wcel 1433  {cab 2067  ∀wral 2348  ∅c0 3251  ∩ cint 3636  suc csuc 4120  ωcom 4331  Ind wind 10721

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-io 662  ax-5 1376  ax-7 1377  ax-gen 1378  ax-ie1 1422  ax-ie2 1423  ax-8 1435  ax-10 1436  ax-11 1437  ax-i12 1438  ax-bndl 1439  ax-4 1440  ax-17 1459  ax-i9 1463  ax-ial 1467  ax-i5r 1468  ax-ext 2063

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-tru 1287  df-nf 1390  df-sb 1686  df-clab 2068  df-cleq 2074  df-clel 2077  df-nfc 2208  df-ral 2353  df-int 3637  df-iom 4332  df-bj-ind 10722

This theorem is referenced by:  bj-omind  10729  bj-omssind  10730  bj-ssom  10731