| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > disj | GIF version | ||
| Description: Two ways of saying that two classes are disjoint (have no members in common). (Contributed by NM, 17-Feb-2004.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| disj | ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | df-in 2979 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)} | |
| 2 | 1 | eqeq1i 2088 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)} = ∅) |
| 3 | abeq1 2188 | . . 3 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)} = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ ∅)) | |
| 4 | imnan 656 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) | |
| 5 | noel 3255 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ ∅ | |
| 6 | 5 | nbn 647 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ ∅)) |
| 7 | 4, 6 | bitr2i 183 | . . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ ∅) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) |
| 8 | 7 | albii 1399 | . . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ ∅) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) |
| 9 | 2, 3, 8 | 3bitri 204 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) |
| 10 | df-ral 2353 | . 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) | |
| 11 | 9, 10 | bitr4i 185 | 1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ∧ wa 102 ↔ wb 103 ∀wal 1282 = wceq 1284 ∈ wcel 1433 {cab 2067 ∀wral 2348 ∩ cin 2972 ∅c0 3251 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 5 ax-2 6 ax-mp 7 ax-ia1 104 ax-ia2 105 ax-ia3 106 ax-in1 576 ax-in2 577 ax-io 662 ax-5 1376 ax-7 1377 ax-gen 1378 ax-ie1 1422 ax-ie2 1423 ax-8 1435 ax-10 1436 ax-11 1437 ax-i12 1438 ax-bndl 1439 ax-4 1440 ax-17 1459 ax-i9 1463 ax-ial 1467 ax-i5r 1468 ax-ext 2063 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 115 df-tru 1287 df-nf 1390 df-sb 1686 df-clab 2068 df-cleq 2074 df-clel 2077 df-nfc 2208 df-ral 2353 df-v 2603 df-dif 2975 df-in 2979 df-nul 3252 |
| This theorem is referenced by: disjr 3293 disj1 3294 disjne 3297 renfdisj 7172 fvinim0ffz 9250 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |