Theorem frforeq3 4102

Description: Equality theorem for the well-founded predicate. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Sep-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
frforeq3	⊢ (𝑆 = 𝑇 → ( FrFor 𝑅𝐴𝑆 ↔ FrFor 𝑅𝐴𝑇))

Proof of Theorem frforeq3

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eleq2 2142	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑆 = 𝑇 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑇))
2	1	imbi2d 228	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑆 = 𝑇 → ((𝑦𝑅𝑥 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ↔ (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑇)))
3	2	ralbidv 2368	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑆 = 𝑇 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑇)))
4		eleq2 2142	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑆 = 𝑇 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑇))
5	3, 4	imbi12d 232	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑆 = 𝑇 → ((∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆) ↔ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑇) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝑇)))
6	5	ralbidv 2368	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑆 = 𝑇 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑇) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝑇)))
7		sseq2 3021	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑆 = 𝑇 → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝑆 ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑇))
8	6, 7	imbi12d 232	. 2 ⊢ (𝑆 = 𝑇 → ((∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑆) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑇) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝑇) → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑇)))
9		df-frfor 4086	. 2 ⊢ ( FrFor 𝑅𝐴𝑆 ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑆))
10		df-frfor 4086	. 2 ⊢ ( FrFor 𝑅𝐴𝑇 ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑇) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝑇) → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑇))
11	8, 9, 10	3bitr4g 221	1 ⊢ (𝑆 = 𝑇 → ( FrFor 𝑅𝐴𝑆 ↔ FrFor 𝑅𝐴𝑇))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 103   = wceq 1284   ∈ wcel 1433  ∀wral 2348   ⊆ wss 2973   class class class wbr 3785   FrFor wfrfor 4082

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-5 1376  ax-7 1377  ax-gen 1378  ax-ie1 1422  ax-ie2 1423  ax-8 1435  ax-11 1437  ax-4 1440  ax-17 1459  ax-i9 1463  ax-ial 1467  ax-i5r 1468  ax-ext 2063

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-nf 1390  df-sb 1686  df-clab 2068  df-cleq 2074  df-clel 2077  df-ral 2353  df-in 2979  df-ss 2986  df-frfor 4086

This theorem is referenced by:  frind  4107