Theorem prarloclemup 6685

Description: Contracting the upper side of an interval which straddles a Dedekind cut. Lemma for prarloc 6693. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Nov-2019.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
prarloclemup	⊢ (((𝑋 ∈ ω ∧ (⟨𝐿, 𝑈⟩ ∈ P ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐿 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ Q)) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ω) → ((𝐴 +Q ([⟨((𝑦 +𝑜 2𝑜) +𝑜 𝑋), 1𝑜⟩] ~Q ·Q 𝑃)) ∈ 𝑈 → (((𝐴 +Q0 ([⟨𝑦, 1𝑜⟩] ~Q0 ·Q0 𝑃)) ∈ 𝐿 ∧ (𝐴 +Q ([⟨((𝑦 +𝑜 2𝑜) +𝑜 suc 𝑋), 1𝑜⟩] ~Q ·Q 𝑃)) ∈ 𝑈) → ∃𝑦 ∈ ω ((𝐴 +Q0 ([⟨𝑦, 1𝑜⟩] ~Q0 ·Q0 𝑃)) ∈ 𝐿 ∧ (𝐴 +Q ([⟨((𝑦 +𝑜 2𝑜) +𝑜 𝑋), 1𝑜⟩] ~Q ·Q 𝑃)) ∈ 𝑈))))

Proof of Theorem prarloclemup

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simpllr 500	. . 3 ⊢ (((((𝑋 ∈ ω ∧ (⟨𝐿, 𝑈⟩ ∈ P ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐿 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ Q)) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ω) ∧ (𝐴 +Q ([⟨((𝑦 +𝑜 2𝑜) +𝑜 𝑋), 1𝑜⟩] ~Q ·Q 𝑃)) ∈ 𝑈) ∧ ((𝐴 +Q0 ([⟨𝑦, 1𝑜⟩] ~Q0 ·Q0 𝑃)) ∈ 𝐿 ∧ (𝐴 +Q ([⟨((𝑦 +𝑜 2𝑜) +𝑜 suc 𝑋), 1𝑜⟩] ~Q ·Q 𝑃)) ∈ 𝑈)) → 𝑦 ∈ ω)
2		simprl 497	. . 3 ⊢ (((((𝑋 ∈ ω ∧ (⟨𝐿, 𝑈⟩ ∈ P ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐿 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ Q)) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ω) ∧ (𝐴 +Q ([⟨((𝑦 +𝑜 2𝑜) +𝑜 𝑋), 1𝑜⟩] ~Q ·Q 𝑃)) ∈ 𝑈) ∧ ((𝐴 +Q0 ([⟨𝑦, 1𝑜⟩] ~Q0 ·Q0 𝑃)) ∈ 𝐿 ∧ (𝐴 +Q ([⟨((𝑦 +𝑜 2𝑜) +𝑜 suc 𝑋), 1𝑜⟩] ~Q ·Q 𝑃)) ∈ 𝑈)) → (𝐴 +Q0 ([⟨𝑦, 1𝑜⟩] ~Q0 ·Q0 𝑃)) ∈ 𝐿)
3		simplr 496	. . 3 ⊢ (((((𝑋 ∈ ω ∧ (⟨𝐿, 𝑈⟩ ∈ P ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐿 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ Q)) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ω) ∧ (𝐴 +Q ([⟨((𝑦 +𝑜 2𝑜) +𝑜 𝑋), 1𝑜⟩] ~Q ·Q 𝑃)) ∈ 𝑈) ∧ ((𝐴 +Q0 ([⟨𝑦, 1𝑜⟩] ~Q0 ·Q0 𝑃)) ∈ 𝐿 ∧ (𝐴 +Q ([⟨((𝑦 +𝑜 2𝑜) +𝑜 suc 𝑋), 1𝑜⟩] ~Q ·Q 𝑃)) ∈ 𝑈)) → (𝐴 +Q ([⟨((𝑦 +𝑜 2𝑜) +𝑜 𝑋), 1𝑜⟩] ~Q ·Q 𝑃)) ∈ 𝑈)
4		rspe 2412	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ ω ∧ ((𝐴 +Q0 ([⟨𝑦, 1𝑜⟩] ~Q0 ·Q0 𝑃)) ∈ 𝐿 ∧ (𝐴 +Q ([⟨((𝑦 +𝑜 2𝑜) +𝑜 𝑋), 1𝑜⟩] ~Q ·Q 𝑃)) ∈ 𝑈)) → ∃𝑦 ∈ ω ((𝐴 +Q0 ([⟨𝑦, 1𝑜⟩] ~Q0 ·Q0 𝑃)) ∈ 𝐿 ∧ (𝐴 +Q ([⟨((𝑦 +𝑜 2𝑜) +𝑜 𝑋), 1𝑜⟩] ~Q ·Q 𝑃)) ∈ 𝑈))
5	1, 2, 3, 4	syl12anc 1167	. 2 ⊢ (((((𝑋 ∈ ω ∧ (⟨𝐿, 𝑈⟩ ∈ P ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐿 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ Q)) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ω) ∧ (𝐴 +Q ([⟨((𝑦 +𝑜 2𝑜) +𝑜 𝑋), 1𝑜⟩] ~Q ·Q 𝑃)) ∈ 𝑈) ∧ ((𝐴 +Q0 ([⟨𝑦, 1𝑜⟩] ~Q0 ·Q0 𝑃)) ∈ 𝐿 ∧ (𝐴 +Q ([⟨((𝑦 +𝑜 2𝑜) +𝑜 suc 𝑋), 1𝑜⟩] ~Q ·Q 𝑃)) ∈ 𝑈)) → ∃𝑦 ∈ ω ((𝐴 +Q0 ([⟨𝑦, 1𝑜⟩] ~Q0 ·Q0 𝑃)) ∈ 𝐿 ∧ (𝐴 +Q ([⟨((𝑦 +𝑜 2𝑜) +𝑜 𝑋), 1𝑜⟩] ~Q ·Q 𝑃)) ∈ 𝑈))
6	5	exp31 356	1 ⊢ (((𝑋 ∈ ω ∧ (⟨𝐿, 𝑈⟩ ∈ P ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐿 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ Q)) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ω) → ((𝐴 +Q ([⟨((𝑦 +𝑜 2𝑜) +𝑜 𝑋), 1𝑜⟩] ~Q ·Q 𝑃)) ∈ 𝑈 → (((𝐴 +Q0 ([⟨𝑦, 1𝑜⟩] ~Q0 ·Q0 𝑃)) ∈ 𝐿 ∧ (𝐴 +Q ([⟨((𝑦 +𝑜 2𝑜) +𝑜 suc 𝑋), 1𝑜⟩] ~Q ·Q 𝑃)) ∈ 𝑈) → ∃𝑦 ∈ ω ((𝐴 +Q0 ([⟨𝑦, 1𝑜⟩] ~Q0 ·Q0 𝑃)) ∈ 𝐿 ∧ (𝐴 +Q ([⟨((𝑦 +𝑜 2𝑜) +𝑜 𝑋), 1𝑜⟩] ~Q ·Q 𝑃)) ∈ 𝑈))))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 102   ∧ w3a 919   ∈ wcel 1433  ∃wrex 2349  ⟨cop 3401  suc csuc 4120  ωcom 4331  (class class class)co 5532  1_𝑜c1o 6017  2_𝑜c2o 6018   +_𝑜 coa 6021  [cec 6127   ~_Q ceq 6469  Qcnq 6470   +_Q cplq 6472   ·_Q cmq 6473   ~_Q0 ceq0 6476   +_Q0 cplq0 6479   ·_Q0 cmq0 6480  Pcnp 6481

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-gen 1378  ax-ie1 1422  ax-ie2 1423  ax-4 1440

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-rex 2354

This theorem is referenced by:  prarloclem3step  6686