MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  spime Structured version   Visualization version   Unicode version

Theorem spime 2256
Description: Existential introduction, using implicit substitution. Compare Lemma 14 of [Tarski] p. 70. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 6-Mar-2018.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
spime.1  |-  F/ x ph
spime.2  |-  ( x  =  y  ->  ( ph  ->  ps ) )
Assertion
Ref Expression
spime  |-  ( ph  ->  E. x ps )

Proof of Theorem spime
StepHypRef Expression
1 spime.1 . . . 4  |-  F/ x ph
21a1i 11 . . 3  |-  ( T. 
->  F/ x ph )
3 spime.2 . . 3  |-  ( x  =  y  ->  ( ph  ->  ps ) )
42, 3spimed 2255 . 2  |-  ( T. 
->  ( ph  ->  E. x ps ) )
54trud 1493 1  |-  ( ph  ->  E. x ps )
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:    -> wi 4   T. wtru 1484   E.wex 1704   F/wnf 1708
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-an 386  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710
This theorem is referenced by:  spimev  2259  exnel  31708
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator