Theorem 4atex2-0cOLDN 35366

Description: Same as 4atex2 35363 except that 𝑆 and 𝑇 are zero. TODO: do we need this one or 4atex2-0aOLDN 35364 or 4atex2-0bOLDN 35365? (Contributed by NM, 27-May-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
4that.l	⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)
4that.j	⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)
4that.a	⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)
4that.h	⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
4atex2-0cOLDN	⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑆 = (0.‘𝐾)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑇 = (0.‘𝐾) ∧ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑧 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑧) = (𝑇 ∨ 𝑧)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑧,𝑟,𝐴   𝐻,𝑟   ∨ ,𝑟,𝑧   𝐾,𝑟,𝑧   ≤ ,𝑟,𝑧   𝑃,𝑟,𝑧   𝑄,𝑟,𝑧   𝑆,𝑟,𝑧   𝑊,𝑟,𝑧   𝑇,𝑟,𝑧   𝑧,𝐻

Proof of Theorem 4atex2-0cOLDN

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simp21l 1178	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑆 = (0.‘𝐾)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑇 = (0.‘𝐾) ∧ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴)
2		simp21r 1179	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑆 = (0.‘𝐾)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑇 = (0.‘𝐾) ∧ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) → ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊)
3		simp23 1096	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑆 = (0.‘𝐾)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑇 = (0.‘𝐾) ∧ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) → 𝑆 = (0.‘𝐾))
4	3	oveq1d 6665	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑆 = (0.‘𝐾)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑇 = (0.‘𝐾) ∧ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) → (𝑆 ∨ 𝑃) = ((0.‘𝐾) ∨ 𝑃))
5		simp32 1098	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑆 = (0.‘𝐾)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑇 = (0.‘𝐾) ∧ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) → 𝑇 = (0.‘𝐾))
6	5	oveq1d 6665	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑆 = (0.‘𝐾)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑇 = (0.‘𝐾) ∧ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) → (𝑇 ∨ 𝑃) = ((0.‘𝐾) ∨ 𝑃))
7	4, 6	eqtr4d 2659	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑆 = (0.‘𝐾)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑇 = (0.‘𝐾) ∧ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) → (𝑆 ∨ 𝑃) = (𝑇 ∨ 𝑃))
8		breq1 4656	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑃 → (𝑧 ≤ 𝑊 ↔ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊))
9	8	notbid 308	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑃 → (¬ 𝑧 ≤ 𝑊 ↔ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊))
10		oveq2 6658	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑃 → (𝑆 ∨ 𝑧) = (𝑆 ∨ 𝑃))
11		oveq2 6658	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑃 → (𝑇 ∨ 𝑧) = (𝑇 ∨ 𝑃))
12	10, 11	eqeq12d 2637	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑃 → ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑧) = (𝑇 ∨ 𝑧) ↔ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑃) = (𝑇 ∨ 𝑃)))
13	9, 12	anbi12d 747	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑃 → ((¬ 𝑧 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑧) = (𝑇 ∨ 𝑧)) ↔ (¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑃) = (𝑇 ∨ 𝑃))))
14	13	rspcev 3309	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑃) = (𝑇 ∨ 𝑃))) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑧 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑧) = (𝑇 ∨ 𝑧)))
15	1, 2, 7, 14	syl12anc 1324	1 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑆 = (0.‘𝐾)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑇 = (0.‘𝐾) ∧ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑧 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑧) = (𝑇 ∨ 𝑧)))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 384   ∧ w3a 1037   = wceq 1483   ∈ wcel 1990   ≠ wne 2794  ∃wrex 2913   class class class wbr 4653  ‘cfv 5888  (class class class)co 6650  lecple 15948  joincjn 16944  0.cp0 17037  Atomscatm 34550  HLchlt 34637  LHypclh 35270

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246  ax-ext 2602

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-3an 1039  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-clab 2609  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-nfc 2753  df-rex 2918  df-rab 2921  df-v 3202  df-dif 3577  df-un 3579  df-in 3581  df-ss 3588  df-nul 3916  df-if 4087  df-sn 4178  df-pr 4180  df-op 4184  df-uni 4437  df-br 4654  df-iota 5851  df-fv 5896  df-ov 6653

This theorem is referenced by: (None)