Axiom ax-rep 4771

Description: Axiom of Replacement. An axiom scheme of Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory. Axiom 5 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 19. It tells us that the image of any set under a function is also a set (see the variant funimaex 5976). Although 𝜑 may be any wff whatsoever, this axiom is useful (i.e. its antecedent is satisfied) when we are given some function and 𝜑 encodes the predicate "the value of the function at 𝑤 is 𝑧." Thus, 𝜑 will ordinarily have free variables 𝑤 and 𝑧- think of it informally as 𝜑(𝑤, 𝑧). We prefix 𝜑 with the quantifier ∀𝑦 in order to "protect" the axiom from any 𝜑 containing 𝑦, thus allowing us to eliminate any restrictions on 𝜑. Another common variant is derived as axrep5 4776, where you can find some further remarks. A slightly more compact version is shown as axrep2 4773. A quite different variant is zfrep6 7134, which if used in place of ax-rep 4771 would also require that the Separation Scheme axsep 4780 be stated as a separate axiom.

There is a very strong generalization of Replacement that doesn't demand function-like behavior of 𝜑. Two versions of this generalization are called the Collection Principle cp 8754 and the Boundedness Axiom bnd 8755.

Many developments of set theory distinguish the uses of Replacement from uses of the weaker axioms of Separation axsep 4780, Null Set axnul 4788, and Pairing axpr 4905, all of which we derive from Replacement. In order to make it easier to identify the uses of those redundant axioms, we restate them as axioms ax-sep 4781, ax-nul 4789, and ax-pr 4906 below the theorems that prove them. (Contributed by NM, 23-Dec-1993.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ax-rep	⊢ (∀𝑤∃𝑦∀𝑧(∀𝑦𝜑 → 𝑧 = 𝑦) → ∃𝑦∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦𝜑)))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤)

Detailed syntax breakdown of Axiom ax-rep

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		wph	. . . . . . 7 wff 𝜑
2		vy	. . . . . . 7 setvar 𝑦
3	1, 2	wal 1481	. . . . . 6 wff ∀𝑦𝜑
4		vz	. . . . . . 7 setvar 𝑧
5	4, 2	weq 1874	. . . . . 6 wff 𝑧 = 𝑦
6	3, 5	wi 4	. . . . 5 wff (∀𝑦𝜑 → 𝑧 = 𝑦)
7	6, 4	wal 1481	. . . 4 wff ∀𝑧(∀𝑦𝜑 → 𝑧 = 𝑦)
8	7, 2	wex 1704	. . 3 wff ∃𝑦∀𝑧(∀𝑦𝜑 → 𝑧 = 𝑦)
9		vw	. . 3 setvar 𝑤
10	8, 9	wal 1481	. 2 wff ∀𝑤∃𝑦∀𝑧(∀𝑦𝜑 → 𝑧 = 𝑦)
11	4, 2	wel 1991	. . . . 5 wff 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
12		vx	. . . . . . . 8 setvar 𝑥
13	9, 12	wel 1991	. . . . . . 7 wff 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥
14	13, 3	wa 384	. . . . . 6 wff (𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦𝜑)
15	14, 9	wex 1704	. . . . 5 wff ∃𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦𝜑)
16	11, 15	wb 196	. . . 4 wff (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦𝜑))
17	16, 4	wal 1481	. . 3 wff ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦𝜑))
18	17, 2	wex 1704	. 2 wff ∃𝑦∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦𝜑))
19	10, 18	wi 4	1 wff (∀𝑤∃𝑦∀𝑧(∀𝑦𝜑 → 𝑧 = 𝑦) → ∃𝑦∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦𝜑)))

This axiom is referenced by:  axrep1  4772  axnulALT  4787  bj-axrep1  32788  bj-snsetex  32951