Theorem bnj1534 30923

Description: First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bnj1534.1	⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑥)}
bnj1534.2	⊢ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐹 → ∀𝑥 𝑤 ∈ 𝐹)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj1534	⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑧) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑧)}

Distinct variable groups:   𝑤,𝐴,𝑥,𝑧   𝑤,𝐹,𝑧   𝑤,𝐻,𝑥,𝑧

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐷(𝑥,𝑧,𝑤)   𝐹(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem bnj1534

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj1534.1	. 2 ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑥)}
2		nfcv 2764	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
3		nfcv 2764	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝐴
4		nfv 1843	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧(𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑥)
5		bnj1534.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐹 → ∀𝑥 𝑤 ∈ 𝐹)
6	5	nfcii 2755	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹
7		nfcv 2764	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑧
8	6, 7	nffv 6198	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐹‘𝑧)
9		nfcv 2764	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐻‘𝑧)
10	8, 9	nfne 2894	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐹‘𝑧) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑧)
11		fveq2 6191	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘𝑧))
12		fveq2 6191	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐻‘𝑧))
13	11, 12	neeq12d 2855	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → ((𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑥) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑧) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑧)))
14	2, 3, 4, 10, 13	cbvrab 3198	. 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑥)} = {𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑧) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑧)}
15	1, 14	eqtri 2644	1 ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑧) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑧)}

Syntax hints:   → wi 4  ∀wal 1481   = wceq 1483   ∈ wcel 1990   ≠ wne 2794  {crab 2916  ‘cfv 5888

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246  ax-ext 2602

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-3an 1039  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-clab 2609  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-nfc 2753  df-ne 2795  df-ral 2917  df-rex 2918  df-rab 2921  df-v 3202  df-dif 3577  df-un 3579  df-in 3581  df-ss 3588  df-nul 3916  df-if 4087  df-sn 4178  df-pr 4180  df-op 4184  df-uni 4437  df-br 4654  df-iota 5851  df-fv 5896

This theorem is referenced by:  bnj1523  31139