Theorem bnj561 30973

Description: Technical lemma for bnj852 30991. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bnj561.18	⊢ (𝜎 ↔ (𝑚 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ 𝑚))
bnj561.19	⊢ (𝜂 ↔ (𝑚 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑚 = suc 𝑝))
bnj561.37	⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜎) → 𝐺 Fn 𝑛)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj561	⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) → 𝐺 Fn 𝑛)

Proof of Theorem bnj561

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj561.18	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜎 ↔ (𝑚 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ 𝑚))
2		bnj561.19	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜂 ↔ (𝑚 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑚 = suc 𝑝))
3	1, 2	bnj556 30970	. 2 ⊢ (𝜂 → 𝜎)
4		bnj561.37	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜎) → 𝐺 Fn 𝑛)
5	3, 4	syl3an3 1361	1 ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) → 𝐺 Fn 𝑛)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 196   ∧ w3a 1037   = wceq 1483   ∈ wcel 1990  suc csuc 5725   Fn wfn 5883  ωcom 7065   ∧ w-bnj17 30752   FrSe w-bnj15 30758

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246  ax-ext 2602

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-3an 1039  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-clab 2609  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-nfc 2753  df-v 3202  df-un 3579  df-sn 4178  df-suc 5729  df-bnj17 30753

This theorem is referenced by:  bnj600  30989  bnj908  31001