Theorem bnj917 31004

Description: Technical lemma for bnj69 31078. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bnj917.1	⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅))
bnj917.2	⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
bnj917.3	⊢ 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅})
bnj917.4	⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)}
bnj917.5	⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj917	⊢ (𝑦 ∈ trCl(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) → ∃𝑓∃𝑛∃𝑖(𝜒 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑓,𝑖,𝑛,𝑦   𝐷,𝑖   𝑅,𝑓,𝑖,𝑛,𝑦   𝑓,𝑋,𝑖,𝑛,𝑦   𝜑,𝑖

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑦,𝑓,𝑛)   𝜓(𝑦,𝑓,𝑖,𝑛)   𝜒(𝑦,𝑓,𝑖,𝑛)   𝐵(𝑦,𝑓,𝑖,𝑛)   𝐷(𝑦,𝑓,𝑛)

Proof of Theorem bnj917

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj917.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅))
2		bnj917.2	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
3		bnj917.3	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅})
4		bnj917.4	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)}
5		biid 251	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
6	1, 2, 3, 4, 5	bnj916 31003	. 2 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ trCl(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) → ∃𝑓∃𝑛∃𝑖(𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖)))
7		bnj917.5	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
8		bnj252 30769	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))
9	7, 8	bitri 264	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))
10	9	3anbi1i 1253	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖)) ↔ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖)))
11		bnj253 30770	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖)) ↔ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖)))
12	10, 11	bitr4i 267	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖)) ↔ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖)))
13	12	3exbii 1776	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑓∃𝑛∃𝑖(𝜒 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖)) ↔ ∃𝑓∃𝑛∃𝑖(𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖)))
14	6, 13	sylibr 224	1 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ trCl(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) → ∃𝑓∃𝑛∃𝑖(𝜒 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 196   ∧ wa 384   ∧ w3a 1037   = wceq 1483  ∃wex 1704   ∈ wcel 1990  {cab 2608  ∀wral 2912  ∃wrex 2913   ∖ cdif 3571  ∅c0 3915  {csn 4177  ∪ ciun 4520  suc csuc 5725   Fn wfn 5883  ‘cfv 5888  ωcom 7065   ∧ w-bnj17 30752   predc-bnj14 30754   trClc-bnj18 30760

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246  ax-ext 2602

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-3an 1039  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-clab 2609  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-nfc 2753  df-ral 2917  df-rex 2918  df-v 3202  df-iun 4522  df-fn 5891  df-bnj17 30753  df-bnj18 30761

This theorem is referenced by:  bnj981  31020  bnj996  31025