Theorem cbvrexcsf 3566

Description: A more general version of cbvrexf 3166 that has no distinct variable restrictions. Changes bound variables using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 13-Jul-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 7-Dec-2014.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
cbvralcsf.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
cbvralcsf.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
cbvralcsf.3	⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑
cbvralcsf.4	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
cbvralcsf.5	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
cbvralcsf.6	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
cbvrexcsf	⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)

Proof of Theorem cbvrexcsf

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		cbvralcsf.1	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
2		cbvralcsf.2	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
3		cbvralcsf.3	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑
4	3	nfn 1784	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦 ¬ 𝜑
5		cbvralcsf.4	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
6	5	nfn 1784	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 ¬ 𝜓
7		cbvralcsf.5	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
8		cbvralcsf.6	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
9	8	notbid 308	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (¬ 𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓))
10	1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 9	cbvralcsf 3565	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝜓)
11	10	notbii 310	. 2 ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝜓)
12		dfrex2 2996	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝜑)
13		dfrex2 2996	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝜓)
14	11, 12, 13	3bitr4i 292	1 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 196   = wceq 1483  Ⅎwnf 1708  Ⅎwnfc 2751  ∀wral 2912  ∃wrex 2913

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246  ax-ext 2602

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-clab 2609  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-nfc 2753  df-ral 2917  df-rex 2918  df-sbc 3436  df-csb 3534

This theorem is referenced by:  cbvrexv2  3570