Theorem ceqsrexv2 31605

Description: Alternate elimitation of a restricted existential quantifier, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Sep-2017.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
ceqsrexv2.1	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ceqsrexv2	⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝜓,𝑥

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜑(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem ceqsrexv2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ceqsrexv2.1	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
2	1	ceqsrexbv 3337	1 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 196   ∧ wa 384   = wceq 1483   ∈ wcel 1990  ∃wrex 2913

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-12 2047  ax-ext 2602

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-clab 2609  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-rex 2918  df-v 3202

This theorem is referenced by:  ceqsralv2  31607