Theorem ceqsrexbv 3337

Description: Elimination of a restricted existential quantifier, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Mar-2014.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
ceqsrexv.1	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ceqsrexbv	⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝜓,𝑥

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜑(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem ceqsrexbv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		r19.42v 3092	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)))
2		eleq1 2689	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵))
3	2	adantr 481	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵))
4	3	pm5.32ri 670	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)))
5	4	bicomi 214	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)))
6	5	baib 944	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)))
7	6	rexbiia 3040	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
8		ceqsrexv.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
9	8	ceqsrexv 3336	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))
10	9	pm5.32i 669	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓))
11	1, 7, 10	3bitr3i 290	1 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 196   ∧ wa 384   = wceq 1483   ∈ wcel 1990  ∃wrex 2913

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-12 2047  ax-ext 2602

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-clab 2609  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-rex 2918  df-v 3202

This theorem is referenced by:  marypha2lem2  8342  txkgen  21455  ceqsrexv2  31605  eq0rabdioph  37340