Theorem difrab0eq 4038

Description: If the difference between the restricting class of a restricted class abstraction and the restricted class abstraction is empty, the restricting class is equal to this restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 31-Dec-2017.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
difrab0eq	⊢ ((𝑉 ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ 𝜑}) = ∅ ↔ 𝑉 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ 𝜑})

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑉

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜑(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem difrab0eq

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ssdif0 3942	. 2 ⊢ (𝑉 ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ (𝑉 ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ 𝜑}) = ∅)
2		ssrabeq 3689	. 2 ⊢ (𝑉 ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝑉 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ 𝜑})
3	1, 2	bitr3i 266	1 ⊢ ((𝑉 ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ 𝜑}) = ∅ ↔ 𝑉 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ 𝜑})

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 196   = wceq 1483  {crab 2916   ∖ cdif 3571   ⊆ wss 3574  ∅c0 3915

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246  ax-ext 2602

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-clab 2609  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-nfc 2753  df-rab 2921  df-v 3202  df-dif 3577  df-in 3581  df-ss 3588  df-nul 3916

This theorem is referenced by:  frgrregorufr0  27188