Theorem nfifd 4114

Description: Deduction version of nfif 4115. (Contributed by NM, 15-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
nfifd.2	⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)
nfifd.3	⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)
nfifd.4	⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nfifd	⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem nfifd

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dfif2 4088	. 2 ⊢ if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵) = {𝑦 ∣ ((𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝜓) → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓))}
2		nfv 1843	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑
3		nfifd.4	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵)
4	3	nfcrd 2771	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)
5		nfifd.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)
6	4, 5	nfimd 1823	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥(𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝜓))
7		nfifd.3	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)
8	7	nfcrd 2771	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
9	8, 5	nfand 1826	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥(𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓))
10	6, 9	nfimd 1823	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥((𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝜓) → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)))
11	2, 10	nfabd 2785	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥{𝑦 ∣ ((𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝜓) → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓))})
12	1, 11	nfcxfrd 2763	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 384  Ⅎwnf 1708   ∈ wcel 1990  {cab 2608  Ⅎwnfc 2751  ifcif 4086

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246  ax-ext 2602

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-clab 2609  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-nfc 2753  df-if 4087

This theorem is referenced by:  nfif  4115  nfxnegd  39668