Theorem nfoprab 6707

Description: Bound-variable hypothesis builder for an operation class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-2013.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
nfoprab.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑤𝜑

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nfoprab	⊢ Ⅎ𝑤{⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑}

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑤   𝑦,𝑤   𝑧,𝑤

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤)

Proof of Theorem nfoprab

Dummy variable 𝑣 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-oprab 6654	. 2 ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑣 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}
2		nfv 1843	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤 𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩
3		nfoprab.1	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤𝜑
4	2, 3	nfan 1828	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)
5	4	nfex 2154	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)
6	5	nfex 2154	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)
7	6	nfex 2154	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)
8	7	nfab 2769	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤{𝑣 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}
9	1, 8	nfcxfr 2762	1 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤{⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑}

Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 384   = wceq 1483  ∃wex 1704  Ⅎwnf 1708  {cab 2608  Ⅎwnfc 2751  ⟨cop 4183  {coprab 6651

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246  ax-ext 2602

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-clab 2609  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-nfc 2753  df-oprab 6654

This theorem is referenced by:  nfmpt2  6724