Theorem opelopabaf 4999

Description: The law of concretion. Theorem 9.5 of [Quine] p. 61. This version of opelopab 4997 uses bound-variable hypotheses in place of distinct variable conditions." (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Dec-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 18-Nov-2016.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
opelopabaf.x	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
opelopabaf.y	⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜓
opelopabaf.1	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
opelopabaf.2	⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V
opelopabaf.3	⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
opelopabaf	⊢ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜓)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)   𝜓(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem opelopabaf

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		opelopabsb 4985	. 2 ⊢ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥][𝐵 / 𝑦]𝜑)
2		opelopabaf.1	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
3		opelopabaf.2	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V
4		opelopabaf.x	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
5		opelopabaf.y	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜓
6		nfv 1843	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐵 ∈ V
7		opelopabaf.3	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
8	4, 5, 6, 7	sbc2iegf 3504	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → ([𝐴 / 𝑥][𝐵 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
9	2, 3, 8	mp2an 708	. 2 ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥][𝐵 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)
10	1, 9	bitri 264	1 ⊢ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜓)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 196   ∧ wa 384   = wceq 1483  Ⅎwnf 1708   ∈ wcel 1990  Vcvv 3200  [wsbc 3435  ⟨cop 4183  {copab 4712

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246  ax-ext 2602  ax-sep 4781  ax-nul 4789  ax-pr 4906

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-3an 1039  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-eu 2474  df-mo 2475  df-clab 2609  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-nfc 2753  df-ne 2795  df-ral 2917  df-rex 2918  df-rab 2921  df-v 3202  df-sbc 3436  df-dif 3577  df-un 3579  df-in 3581  df-ss 3588  df-nul 3916  df-if 4087  df-sn 4178  df-pr 4180  df-op 4184  df-opab 4713

This theorem is referenced by: (None)