Theorem tgbtwnswapid 25387

Description: If you can swap the first two arguments of a betweenness statement, then those arguments are identical. Theorem 3.4 of [Schwabhauser] p. 30. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Mar-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
tkgeom.p	⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)
tkgeom.d	⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)
tkgeom.i	⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)
tkgeom.g	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)
tgbtwnswapid.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)
tgbtwnswapid.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)
tgbtwnswapid.3	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)
tgbtwnswapid.4	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐶))
tgbtwnswapid.5	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
tgbtwnswapid	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)

Proof of Theorem tgbtwnswapid

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		tkgeom.p	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)
2		tkgeom.d	. . . 4 ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)
3		tkgeom.i	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)
4		tkgeom.g	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)
5	4	ad2antrr 762	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐴) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐵))) → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)
6		tgbtwnswapid.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)
7	6	ad2antrr 762	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐴) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐵))) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)
8		simplr 792	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐴) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐵))) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃)
9		simprl 794	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐴) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐵))) → 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐴))
10	1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9	axtgbtwnid 25365	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐴) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐵))) → 𝐴 = 𝑥)
11		tgbtwnswapid.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)
12	11	ad2antrr 762	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐴) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐵))) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)
13		simprr 796	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐴) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐵))) → 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐵))
14	1, 2, 3, 5, 12, 8, 13	axtgbtwnid 25365	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐴) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐵))) → 𝐵 = 𝑥)
15	10, 14	eqtr4d 2659	. 2 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐴) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐵))) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
16		tgbtwnswapid.3	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)
17		tgbtwnswapid.4	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐶))
18		tgbtwnswapid.5	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶))
19	1, 2, 3, 4, 11, 6, 16, 6, 11, 17, 18	axtgpasch 25366	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐴) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐵)))
20	15, 19	r19.29a 3078	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 384   = wceq 1483   ∈ wcel 1990  ‘cfv 5888  (class class class)co 6650  Basecbs 15857  distcds 15950  TarskiGcstrkg 25329  Itvcitv 25335

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246  ax-ext 2602  ax-nul 4789

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-3an 1039  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-eu 2474  df-clab 2609  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-nfc 2753  df-ral 2917  df-rex 2918  df-rab 2921  df-v 3202  df-sbc 3436  df-dif 3577  df-un 3579  df-in 3581  df-ss 3588  df-nul 3916  df-if 4087  df-pw 4160  df-sn 4178  df-pr 4180  df-op 4184  df-uni 4437  df-br 4654  df-iota 5851  df-fv 5896  df-ov 6653  df-trkgb 25348  df-trkg 25352

This theorem is referenced by:  legtri3  25485